Skip to comments.
Darwin on the Right: Why Christians and conservatives should accept evolution
Scientific American ^
| October 2006 issue
| Michael Shermer
Posted on 09/18/2006 1:51:27 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,080, 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
I see this horse has died but good. "Posting without reading the whole thread since 1998."
1,081
posted on
09/22/2006 7:45:32 AM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: PatrickHenry
"But it wasn't that bad, really!" placemarker. ;)
1,082
posted on
09/22/2006 7:48:55 AM PDT
by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Religion Moderator
Thank you for the very hard work you do on these threads. It is a difficult & thankless job you have.
Take Care,
Comment #1,084 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,085 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,086 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,087 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,088 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,089 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,090 Removed by Moderator
Comment #1,091 Removed by Moderator
If any evidence exists that this topic is poisonous to the religion forum, this thread is it.
1,092
posted on
09/22/2006 2:23:49 PM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: Liberal Classic
An excellent and well-written post. Thanks.
1,093
posted on
09/22/2006 2:50:36 PM PDT
by
LibertarianSchmoe
("...yeah, but, that's different!" - mating call of the North American Ten-Toed Hypocrite)
To: Warrior of Justice
- I have...but you're too busy being "right" to hear and see.
You have claimed that Hovind is called a liar because he believes the Bible to be infallable. You are demonstratably wrong. Your false claims regarding the documentation of Hovind's dishonesty does not make him become honest.
1,094
posted on
09/22/2006 3:21:14 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Warrior of Justice
- Right...
Then you acknowledge that I was correct, and that your claims were a fabrication.
1,095
posted on
09/22/2006 3:22:02 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Warrior of Justice
- I CONDENSED several PAGES of an ENTIRE entry down to the pertinent points. I quoted word for word.
You are contardicting yourself. Did you condense the material, or did you quote word for word? Did the word "myth" appear anywhere in the actual entry?
You still have NOt refuted ANYTHING you keep parroting "That's not what i read. PAW-ROT! That's not what I read."
You do not prove me wrong by making false claims about what I have said.
1,096
posted on
09/22/2006 3:23:29 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
Comment #1,097 Removed by Moderator
To: Dimensio
This hoary old thread still limping along? ===> Placemarker <===
1,098
posted on
09/22/2006 4:27:20 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: Coyoteman
This hoary old thread still limping along? Please be respectful. This thread is like springtime. Every post is wonderful!
1,099
posted on
09/22/2006 4:50:21 PM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(Science-denial is not conservative. It's reality-denial and it's unhealthy.)
To: PatrickHenry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,080, 1,081-1,100, 1,101-1,120 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson