Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Religious Days Did Jesus Observe?
Good News Magazine ^ | March/April 2004 | Roger Foster

Posted on 03/25/2005 12:29:50 PM PST by DouglasKC

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last
To: Frog Legs
God's word in the Bible is good enough for me. His word says keep the feast of unleavened bread - that's what I am going to do. And this is in the NEW TESTAMENT.

Yup. Good enough for me too.

61 posted on 03/26/2005 12:08:51 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dangus
>> That is true if you believe that the institution that became the Roman Catholic church has faithfully carried out Christ's commission and is in fact the one and only true church. I happen to believe that the early church strayed from the truth when it came to God's holy days and that tradition has usurped biblical truth. <<
And when had Satan triumphed over Christ so totally that for 1800 years no Christian kept the Sabbath? The 1st-century church recognized Sunday as the Sabbath. Satan cannot triumph over the Churchm, as 7th-Day adventists unwittingly imply he has, for Christ told Peter as much.

Plenty of Christians kept the sabbath throughout history. Well into the 4th century it was apparently so prevelent that the early Roman church had to issue an edict at the council of Laodecia NOT to observe it by resting. Here is Canon XXIX from that council:

CANON XXIX.
CHRISTIANS must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.

The mere fact that they had to tell people not to observe the sabbath by "resting" over 300 years after the death of Christ shows that many many Christians must have been keeping it.

62 posted on 03/26/2005 12:17:38 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: gbcdoj; Frog Legs
v. 8 is showing the reason for v. 9-13: "I have written to you ... with such a one, not so much as to eat." In other words, they were to be excluded from communion.

I would say that's a modern day interpretation. Paul actually goes much further. He says that anyone who calls himself a Christian yet continues to willfully engage in obviously sinful behavior should put out of the church:

1Co 5:13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

Your interpretation makes no sense. Why would Paul have thrown a command to keep the Feast of Unleavened Bread into his discussion of the measures to take against the fornicator?

Because it shows the spiritual purpose of the holy day. The practice of seeking out and removing leaven from your household is a yearly physical reminder that we must seek out and remove sin from our lives. Paul extends the lesson to show that a sinful person in the midst of the congregation is like leavening in bread...it spreads to everyone else if tolerated. One bad apple can spoil the whole barrel.

63 posted on 03/26/2005 12:30:50 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: DouglasKC

Thanks for the ping. Another great post!


68 posted on 03/26/2005 6:01:58 AM PST by whipitgood (Public schools have replaced a biblical moral code with pragmatism. Civilization, beware!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Show me a single source of anyone even suggesting to keep the Sabbath on a Saturday from between 800 and 1500 AD.


69 posted on 03/26/2005 6:14:41 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: solitas

Classic!!


70 posted on 03/26/2005 6:18:56 AM PST by WhiteGuy ("a taxpayer dollar must be spent wisely, or not at all" - GW BUSH </sarcasm>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
If we are to truly follow Christ, shouldn't we consider which religious days He observed?

If that were the case we’d all be observant Jews.
71 posted on 03/26/2005 6:20:32 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Do you follow Paul or Y'shua?

A false dichotomy if ever there was one.

72 posted on 03/26/2005 6:28:35 AM PST by jude24 (The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then gets elected and proves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

>> This is an example of a holiday that is not commandmended to be kept by God. Obviously observing it is not wrong. The difference is that it does not attempt to replace or supplant God's holy daysl. 2 Maccabees even shows that the kept God's Holy days: <<

How preposterous it would be to suggest tha it was meant to SUPPLANT or REPLACE a holy day? Since when does the observance of one feast supplant or replace another? Wherever did you get the bizarre notion that I endorsed something of the sort?

Now, I could have better noted that I did some calendar translation. What your source calls the "five and twentieth day of the same month," is of course referring to "Caslau" 25th.

I'm not sure where you're from, unless "KC" is a hint. But where I'm from, New york, Hannukah, the feast of the Taberbacles, is a big deal. And if you realize that the end of Hannukah is the 25th of "Caslau" and Christmas is the 25th of December, you recognize that plainly, Caslau is very close to December. As close as they can be given that one is a lunar calendar and one is solar calendar.

Had I had any question of your ability to recognize that the Jews kept a different calendar from us, I would certainly have noted the translation from one calendar to the next.

Given that Christmas (Dec. 25th) is celebrated nine months after the historical day of his death (Mar. 25th), according to the Roman calendar, and the anicent belief (cited by Constantine in your own source) that prophets died on the day they were conceived, there is strong basis that this translation of "Ceslau" to December is warranted.


73 posted on 03/26/2005 6:34:34 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

To: DouglasKC
If you are Jewish you observe the Old Testament. If you are Christian you observe the New Testament. Jesus was ultimate sacrifice so for Christians we place emphasis on that - his birth, death and resurrection. NO Old Testament feast surpasses that. Nor would I celebrate Passover over Easter. It simply wouldn't make sense.
75 posted on 03/26/2005 6:52:09 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
I celebrate Easter.

I celebrate the death, resurrection of the LIVING God, Jesus Christ. I can't imagine why a Christian would elevate Passover over this miraculous event. I suspect Satan would be thrilled if we ignored Christ conquering death and sitting on the throne in heaven - King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Passover doesn't compare to that and it had nothing to do with Constantine. Geesh!
76 posted on 03/26/2005 6:55:02 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jude24
XS>Do you follow Paul or Y'shua?

j24>A false dichotomy if ever there was one.

Only if you consider Paul as the second person of the G-dhead !

B'shem Y'shua
chuck

77 posted on 03/26/2005 6:59:08 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Only if you consider Paul as the second person of the G-dhead !

Or if you believe that Paul followed the second person of the Godhead himself. I reject the premise of the extreme wings of Messianic Judaism, that considers Paul a corrupter of Christianity.

It's a reversion to Phariseeism all over again.

78 posted on 03/26/2005 7:03:59 AM PST by jude24 (The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then gets elected and proves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Paul is very difficult to read and open to misinterpretation so said Peter.

B'shem Y'shua
chuck
ps: off to shul

79 posted on 03/26/2005 7:13:15 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Y'shua <==> YHvH is my Salvation (Psalm 118-14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
Paul is very difficult to read and open to misinterpretation so said Peter.

No more than the rest of the Scriptures. Peter also said this too.

80 posted on 03/26/2005 7:15:47 AM PST by jude24 (The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then gets elected and proves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson