Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

8-year-old's first Holy Communion invalidated by Church
Newsday ^ | August 12, 2004 | John Curran

Posted on 08/12/2004 10:41:10 AM PDT by sidewalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 521-538 next last
To: dubyaismypresident

~Slaps knee~

Good one.


101 posted on 08/12/2004 12:08:39 PM PDT by Fifthmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Sorry,I am not hearing it.

Because bishops cannot openly campaign against a particular candidate, and that's what they would be doing.

It would also blow up in the bishops' faces, as there would be a significant backlash.

Kerry knows where the bishops stand, and he knows what Church teaching is.

102 posted on 08/12/2004 12:10:41 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Who is the father of the Sons of Zebedee"?--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker

"I hope this aides your understanding of what we believe."


I do appreciate your intelligent response, but unfortunately it raises more questions for me than it answers.

Background: MY first 18 years were spent as a Catholic, so I'm very familiar with the dogma.


"The presence of Christ is the spiritual reality. The appearance of bread is the physical reality. "

Exactly. It's the spiritual part that's important, so why the fuss over wheat?


103 posted on 08/12/2004 12:10:59 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker

"Do you think God would mind celebrating Holy Communion with doritos tortilla chips, chocolate chip cookies, pizza, crabcakes, deep fried chicken, or a pastrami on rye?"


Honestly, no - I do not, as long as it's consecrated.

I think small-minded thinking like this is limited to human beings and isn't part of God. God isn't an impetulant child, but rather an omnipotent deity. As such, I don't think It concerns itself with such trivialities.


104 posted on 08/12/2004 12:12:57 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio

"You're right--you don't get it."


No, I get it perfectly. Some human being thinks he knows that God gives a damn about wheat or not. As an omnipotent deity, I think it's sacrilege to assume God is concerned with such trivial matters, as long as its consecrated and the heart of the receiver is genuine.

"Wheatness" per se no longer exists after the Consecration."

Right - making 'wheatness' or lack thereof a non-factor. Thanks for agreeing.


105 posted on 08/12/2004 12:15:04 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Well the twelve apostles were all of one Accord. How they all fit, I have no idea.

LOL

106 posted on 08/12/2004 12:16:40 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: nmh

"Rituals do NOT save anyone. It is you HEART that He evaluates. Rituals are nice but they do NOT save anyone. This thread is an example of a ritual, communion, taken to an extreme and is not the teachings of Christ of the Bible. "


Yes, yes - a 1000 times YES. Great example about the thief on the cross, btw.


107 posted on 08/12/2004 12:16:44 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Fifthmark

LOL!


108 posted on 08/12/2004 12:22:14 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
I don't think It concerns itself with such trivialities.

Is there a reason you're referring to God with "it" instead of "He"? Just wondering.

On another point, I find that God is alllll about the details. Passover, for example. You had to kill a lamb, an unblemished lamb, then smear the blood over your door, and then you had to EAT the lamb. Do this or die. Did God give the people who didn't kill the right kind of lamb, or didn't get around to smearing the blood, or didn't eat the lamb, a break? Maybe, maybe not. We can HOPE so. We don't KNOW so.
109 posted on 08/12/2004 12:23:01 PM PDT by Lilllabettt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Fifthmark
I think it had a moon roof

That would be a Son roof.

110 posted on 08/12/2004 12:23:56 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

That's very good :-D


111 posted on 08/12/2004 12:25:22 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba
If rituals do not save anyone and an omnipotent God does not care about the outward form, then why the insistence of many Protestants on baptism by immersion for adults only?

This is more of a rhetorical question, but I see very few Christians who live sola scriptura -- there's always intervening commentary and tradition.

For what it's worth, I think my Catholic friends do "strain at gnats" on this particular issue, but we all cling to points of doctrine and practice that seem odd to others.

"In essentials, unity; in doubtful matters, liberty; in all things, charity."
112 posted on 08/12/2004 12:26:55 PM PDT by good_fight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Repairman Jack

You say this because your faith is founded on sentimentalism: an identity of what’s true with what’s emotionally congenial. To suggest that “good intentions” are enough to validate communion is an invitation to an endless voyage of self-deception and eventually self-worship. Fundamental to the idea of communion is that we’re all doing the same thing – not our own thing. The sentimentality of private good intentions isn’t much of an answer to Christ who founded a Church and endowed her with authority. It’s an act of radical individualism, a declaration that there’s no truth mysteriously hidden but unfolding in the sacraments.

Not to get personal, but if you’re really a repairman, you probably have little or no serious training in theology. I don’t know what it is you repair for a living, but would you trust an untrained priest’s advice on how to do your job?


113 posted on 08/12/2004 12:32:19 PM PDT by Romulus ("Que la Terreur soit a l'ordre du jour.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: horatio

"Leaving Saddam in power is OK, but creating a special wafer so a young girl doesn't get sick from her Communion isn't?"


Dragging their feet on the whole priestly pedophilia issue is OK too, as long as 8 year old girls who are allergic to wheat aren't allowed to receive a rice-wafered Communion.

What's amazing is that people in this thread think that God actually CARES about such trivial minutae.


114 posted on 08/12/2004 12:33:58 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Floyd R Turbo
And they wonder why people shake their head in disgust and walk away.

I don't wonder at all. It's pride and anger.

115 posted on 08/12/2004 12:35:02 PM PDT by Romulus ("Que la Terreur soit a l'ordre du jour.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
You say this because your faith is founded on sentimentalism

Since you're a mind reader, guess what I'm thinking right now. Don't blush.

It’s an act of radical individualism

All good things are.

Not to get personal, but if you’re really a repairman, you probably have little or no serious training in theology.

Not to get personal, but I bet you're not really one of two twins suckling at a wolf's teats.

It's a screen name. Don't read too much into it.

116 posted on 08/12/2004 12:36:04 PM PDT by Repairman Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

LOL


117 posted on 08/12/2004 12:41:06 PM PDT by Fifthmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Repairman Jack
All good things are.

Good luck being your own god.

118 posted on 08/12/2004 12:41:18 PM PDT by Romulus ("Que la Terreur soit a l'ordre du jour.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Lilllabettt

"Is there a reason you're referring to God with "it" instead of "He"? Just wondering."


I haven't met God personally and am thus unaware of 'his' sexual orientation. In short, I have no proof that God has a penis. Do you? Just wondering...


"We don't KNOW so."

Exactly. I jsut find it hard to believe that God is so small-minded as to care about the symbolism of wheat vs. the intent of an 8 year old girl who's unable to consume wheat. VERY hard to believe that God would be such an impetulant child over such matters, esp. in light of the other myriad problems people are facing and dealing with.


119 posted on 08/12/2004 12:42:04 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: good_fight

"then why the insistence of many Protestants on baptism by immersion for adults only?"


I don't know - I was raised Catholic.


120 posted on 08/12/2004 12:43:22 PM PDT by Blzbba (John Kerry - Dawn of a New Error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 521-538 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson