Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of Archbishop O'Malley's remarks on church closings
Boston Herald ^ | May 25, 2004 | Bishop O'Malley

Posted on 05/25/2004 11:13:01 AM PDT by tridentine

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2004 11:13:05 AM PDT by tridentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tridentine; *Catholic_list; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp IV; ...
We need to put the accent on Catholic and come together as one people ready to make sacrifices for our Church. We are part of something bigger than ourselves.

Domenico Bettinelli, made some interesting observations about this situation, at his blogspot.

"The first news of closing parishes is coming out. Among the closed, it is interesting to note that the parishes of about 90 percent of the 58 priests who demanded Cardinal Law’s resignation are there. My guess is that these guys had been identified as troublemakers long ago and were put in dead or dying parishes where they could do little harm.

More news on this topic here.

Fight to save parishes continues

2 posted on 05/25/2004 12:00:57 PM PDT by NYer (Even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light! (2Cor 11:14))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american colleen

Eagerly awaiting your thoughts on this. Thanks.


3 posted on 05/25/2004 12:37:27 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

wow - something good seems to be happening amongst numerous bishops.


4 posted on 05/25/2004 12:41:00 PM PDT by Notwithstanding (Fides et Ratio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Land of the Irish; narses; Maximilian; Loyalist; TradicalRC; tridentine; ultima ratio; ...
John Kerry Catholicism...

He will do for America what liberalism has done for Boston...

5 posted on 05/25/2004 1:26:33 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maryz
"the reconfiguration process..."

Interesting jargon.

6 posted on 05/25/2004 1:28:43 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
And for to the Church.
7 posted on 05/25/2004 1:42:36 PM PDT by broadsword (Liberalism is the societal AIDS virus, that helps our enemies to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: broadsword
Just contemplate this - what really in a John Kerry Amerika would prevent a homosexual clergyman and his lover from adopting male children??? A Kerry Supreme Court??? Gee , would maybe O'Malley, McCarrick, and Maphony consider denying Holy Communion at that point??? Duh....

The church has been gang-raped...

8 posted on 05/25/2004 1:48:08 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
"the reconfiguration process..."

Well, it has been a process. First, they coupled neighboring parishes together to share resources, staggering Mass times so that both wouldn't have a Mass at the same hour. They started last year (before O'Malley even started) working toward consolidating schools; they closed the school attached to the one parish in Southie that was just closed (St. Augustine's). (I was in that parish for over 20 years.) The current church was built in 1882. It's brick; the rectory is attached to the back, the convent and the old school about a block away, also brick. They're lovely buildings, but have been far gone in disrepair for a while. Part of the problem is that a big chunk of the parish is a low-income housing project. (The really poor don't seem to go to church the way they used to -- my impression only; I have no figures.) The yuppification of the blocks outside the project doesn't seem to involve church-goers.

I don't know what they'll do with St. Augustine's chapel -- the original church in the middle of the old graveyard. It's a lovely little gem of a church and a National Historical Monument, so it won't be torn down.

St. Augustine's was paired with St. Monica's, a much newer building (the old St. Monica's was sold back in the 50s, when the new one was built; for a long time, it was a St. Paul's Bookstore, but now it's condos). St. Monica's is between two low-income housing projects.

The recently retired pastor of St. Augustine's-St. Monica's had fought for the last few years he was there to keep St. Monica's open. He's been in poor health for at least 10 years, but he didn't want to leave all the old people in the project who still went to St. Monica's to be left without a church.

They've been talking about closing parishes for several years now. One was actually closed several years ago; the church building is being made into condos. It's not an especially pretty church, but it's an old, uncompromising building -- large blocks of rough gray stone form the walls, probably at least a foot deep, a blunt steeple of the same stone, stained-glass window shaped windows. You really can't disguise that it was built as a church.

This is way too long -- I'm rambling. It's all very sad, though. Back in the early 70s (?), I saw in the paper that they were tearing down the lovely little church I had gone to for four years in childhood -- was confirmed there and graduated from its grammar school. My heart still weeps over that one. (And they didn't even close the parish then -- they bought a nearby -- rather ugly -- Baptist church.)

9 posted on 05/25/2004 2:16:20 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maryz; johnb2004; broadsword; NYer; american colleen; narses
I think the laity of the parishes should SUE the diocese. Regular people in parishes are being punished for the sodomite abuse that was tolerated by diocesan officials. A conservative Catholic group of lay people should sue for damages and privatize the schools under lay, heterosexual control.

This homosexual thing is a social engineering experiment to gutt the church and integrate Catholics into the gay agenda. Fight back. Sue the homosexuals, sue the diocese, sue NAMBLA. Get your own buildings back. Heterosexual Catholic people donated the money for these treasures. What has happened in American Catholicism is that some of the worst elements in the Catholic community have managed to get control of the church - liberals, sodomites, and catered-buffet-fed careerists only interested in fine dining and vacation resorts.

10 posted on 05/25/2004 2:48:03 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
I think the laity of the parishes should SUE the diocese.

Are you serious???? Our own regional vicar has already plotted out the order in which parishes should be closed, down to the last one. One more lawsuit and they can just close down the Boston archdiocese and have done with it.

11 posted on 05/25/2004 2:52:54 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maryz
A priest who engages in sodomy or who molests children is guilty of fraud. A bishop who presents such an abnormal person to parishes and schools as a "Catholic priest" is also guilty of fraud. There are liabilities involved for engaging in fraud. Canon law needs to be changed. A priest who enages in sodomy should be automatically excommunicated, considered no longer a priest, and subject to canonical and civic, legal penalties for fraud.

Someone like Paul Shanley, almost certainly engaged in sacrilege. The debate on sodomy among clergy needs to be shifted from the PC word games with "sodomy" and "sexual abuse of children" to sacrilege and fraud.

12 posted on 05/25/2004 2:54:27 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

Fine. Medeiros was in while Shanley was in bloom. We can sue him. Oh, wait -- he died in 1984; the process server's going to have a tough time of it.


13 posted on 05/25/2004 2:58:56 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Half in irony somewhat..

However, that "fraud" in the legal sense was involved in these scandals seems pretty clear. At least hal the Catholic colleges and universities in this country are engaged in fraud. They claim to be "Catholic" while delivering a very non-Catholic, liberal product. I think it would be interesting to see what would happen if a judge decided Catholic officials could be held responsible for engaging in fraud. And what about all those millionaire trustees showing up for the black-tie galas with the college presidents and bishops???

14 posted on 05/25/2004 3:02:04 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maryz

The administrative apparatus of the diocese has already been held responsible for the molestations, even though the former bishop has passed on.


15 posted on 05/25/2004 3:03:26 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

At this point, I am very tired of it all -- and especially of lawyers, and I'm more inclined to retire to the desert and spend my remaining years in prayer and penance for the world. (Not much available desert in Southie, though; the beach would be ok in the winter, but it's not really conducive to prayer and/or penance in warmer weather.)


16 posted on 05/25/2004 3:11:17 PM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maryz
I'm NOT all that fond of these large legal settlements particularly when the "victim" cooperated willingly in sexual relationships with the offending clergy. Have police departments or public school systems or the U.S. Army been forced to pay such settlements? However, it might be useful to force church diocesan officials to make sure that when they send people to staff a parish or a school that those people are believing, faithful Catholics. That has not always been done in the past - KNOWINGLY. They knew some of these types did not follow the church's teachings on sexual morality.
17 posted on 05/25/2004 3:24:40 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity; maryz
I think the laity of the parishes should SUE the diocese. Regular people in parishes are being punished for the sodomite abuse that was tolerated by diocesan officials. A conservative Catholic group of lay people should sue for damages and privatize the schools under lay, heterosexual control.

There was talk regarding closing parishes going back way before the scandals. The scandals didn't help but the problem is that most Catholics do not go to Mass and most Catholics do not send their kids to Catholic school for a Catholic religious education.

A couple of local studies have shown that only about 20% of Boston Archdiocese Catholics attend Mass once a week.

18 posted on 05/25/2004 3:41:21 PM PDT by american colleen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

The sad part is the diocese would most likely be more responsive to such a suit more than it would to the pleas of the orthodox faithful. I thought the new bishop was touted as more catholic than the Pope?


19 posted on 05/25/2004 4:11:37 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson