Posted on 02/07/2004 12:26:51 PM PST by Gamecock
John Kerry and Jane Fonda at a rally of some sort in Viet era. (Kerry behind Fonda ... over the middle of her head.)
Do you think it's Kerry? I do.
What I hear being asked is "how man a man be held accountable, if he has no choice in what he does?" Do I have the question right? And why is it that when I respond to questions asked by P-Marlowe, you're telling me I have his questions wrong? Are you sure you two are using the same script?
Only if you'll agree that's Diane Keaton to the immediate right (our right) of your Kerry. ============
TWEEEEEEEEET
Flag on the field.
Attempted diversion, or change of the subject.
Penalty refused. Ball is back in court, subject being Pelagian doctrine.
Thanks for your opinion. What matters is if The Apostle Paul answered Marlowe's questions. You and I are just spectators, and I'm not sharing any of my Milk Duds.
Please point me to where in anything Marlowe has said he indicated God was "surprised."
We thank God for His unmerited mercy because it is all of Him. Otherwise, salvation is only partially due to God's mercy and partially due to our clever choice.
(For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;) [Rom. 9:11].
God rejected the first born, and chose the younger son. At that time Jacob had done no good, and Esau had done no evil. It does not rest upon birth that was identical and it does not rest upon their character or their works. Paul makes the entire choice rest upon "the purpose of God according to election." He further qualifies his statement that it is not of works, but rests upon God who calls. However, the calling in this verse is not to salvation.
It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger [Rom. 9:12].
This is from Genesis 25:23, which was given before the two boys were born. "And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger."
As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated [Rom. 9:13].
This is from the last book in the Old Testament, see Mal. 1:23. This statement was not made until the two boys had lived their lives and two nations had come from them, which was about two thousand years later, and much history had been made.
I believe its called context. :)
BigMack
Presbys hold to a horizontal accountability of churches within the faith, per Calvin, and Baptists don't. Each church is free to decide.
it fascinates me that this argument is a backhanded way of saying that free will ---> works righteousness. How often does it need to be repeated that the Bible itself does not consider believing to be a work.
But there are squawks when someone says: total decree = "God willed Hitler to be the murderer of 6 million Jews."
Again, funny how I address posts to Marlowe, and only get direct responses from others. Check your playbooks again. Which one of you is the ventrioquist, and which one the puppet?
You missed Paul making a direct connection between the two OT quotes, in verses 12 and 13, tying both together into verse 15, and wrapping up by summarizing the principle in verse 16. God wills whom He wills, and the "willed" cannot refuse Him. The overall context is found a few verses back, in verse 8:
"it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendents".
Everything that follows in the chapter, from Esau to pottery, ties back into this. Are you really going to tell me that a discussion about who constitutes the children of God is not a discussion which includes salvation?
But then again, Marlowe's question didn't deal with salvation, either.
I believe its called context. :)
There is a well-known Freeper who was a H.S. classmate of Dahmer. But then, I graduated from H.S. with Robert Yates, the Spokane serial killer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.