Posted on 10/12/2003 7:37:16 AM PDT by tomball
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:50:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON -- Wesley K. Clark's fledgling presidential campaign hit another bump last night, with rival Democrats launching their toughest attacks yet on the retired general's past support of Republicans and his shifting positions on the war with Iraq.
"I must say, I've been very disappointed since Wes Clark came into this race about the various positions he has taken on the war against Saddam Hussein," Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman said near the opening of last night's nine-candidate debate in Phoenix, the fourth such meeting during the past month between the aspirants for the 2004 nomination.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
Paging Hillary Rodham Clinton!
|
|
|
|
|
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
|
But the more exposure that they get, the more unsuitable all of them appear to the general public. Now we have Ashley Clark entering late to blunt the juggernaut of Howard Dean. Clark is just as flimsy a candidate as Dean would be--going up against POTUS. Actually, Gephart or Lieberman could be much more formidable in the general election, but they probably can't get the Democratic nomination.
Still, these weekly "debates" should not be televised and foisted on the voters as a public service. This is just the media's desperate attempt to keep the 2004 race competitive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.