Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Musical morality
Edmonton Sun ^ | 12/10/03 | TED BYFIELD

Posted on 10/12/2003 3:05:44 AM PDT by Cdnexpat

Well, well, well, what d'ya know? The music industry has suddenly discovered the existence of something called morality.

They seem to have been singularly unaware of it before. In their exuberance to extol unrestricted sex, violence, rebellion and everything else they imply by the word "freedom," things like right and wrong didn't figure prominently in their product lines.

For years, in fact, the same industry has urged 12-year-olds and up to do whatever came into their heads. The message always was: The hell with authority. Do your own thing.

Now they have discovered that they need morality to stay in business. Through the Internet, people can easily acquire their products without paying for them. Or they can buy the CD and distribute scores of copies of it free to their friends.

So the industry has begun a vigorous advertising campaign, lecturing youngsters on the need for honesty. "Real Fans Get the Real Thing," says one ad. "You may not think you're doing anything illegal," it intones. "The fact is, however, that when you do this sort of thing you're taking something that doesn't belong to you... You are stealing."

It continues: "Stealing music is against the law. Stealing music betrays the songwriters and recording artists who create it. Stealing music stifles the careers of new artists and up-and-coming bands. Stealing music threatens the livelihood of the thousands of working people - from recording engineers to store clerks ..."

To which the youngster, schooled by this same industry, might well reply: "Well, ain't that just too bad?" In fact, I could even write a song myself about it:

I stole the hottest number of the week.

Well ain't that just too bad?

They say I'm a dumb-ass and a thievin' freak.

Well ain't that real sad?

So you don't find it thrillin'

To miss that second billion

Now ain't that just too bad?

A friend of mine, somewhat closer to the music market than I (meaning that he's 50-some years younger), also came closer to the point:

Sorry, man, about swiping your new song,

We're only doin' what you taught us all along.

This problem, we're told, affects not just music but the whole entertainment business. Through the mysterious powers of networks like Kazaa and Morpheus, entire movies can be readily downloaded and distributed free. On occasion even first-run films have been found circulating as freebies before they got into the theatres. Music theft is running to an appalling 2.6 billion files per month, says a press release.

Policing this is all but impossible, so the music industry has been reduced to the extremity of these unaccustomed moral appeals to the same youngsters whose consciences they have worked so diligently to destroy.

I find great difficulty feeling sorry for these people. They don't seem to realize that the authority behind the moral principle, Thou shalt not steal, the one they now advance as sacrosanct, is exactly the same as the authority behind the principle, Honour thy father and thy mother, or Thou shalt not commit adultery, the ones they have spent the last 25 years jeering at.

The music industry, however, is only the first sector to find itself so ensnared. There will certainly be others. Capitalism, whether you consider it good or bad - and I consider it good - is very much the product of Protestant Christianity. One of its first apologists, Adam Smith, knew that it would function properly only when combined with a strong moral authority.

For most of the 19th and early 20th centuries its practitioners were fully aware of this and were careful never to challenge its religious underpinnings.

The smartasses of the late 20th century almost universally have rejected that principle. Banks vie with high-tech companies to rid themselves of hoary old rules and proudly proclaim themselves liberated from the "intolerances" of the past. Now one industry, probably the most lucrative one, finds itself totally dependent on those rules and its clients utterly contemptuous of them.

So ain't that just too bad? You're absolutely right it's too bad, and it will probably become a whole lot worse.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: internet; morals; music; musicindustry
Pigeons coming home to roost.
1 posted on 10/12/2003 3:05:44 AM PDT by Cdnexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
Sez it all!
2 posted on 10/12/2003 3:08:01 AM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

WHAT? Y'all ain't given to Free Republic yet?
We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one! Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 10/12/2003 3:08:16 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
All this whining the recording industry is doing about "losing money" due to file-sharing is not backed up by the facts.

I have my Billboard in front of me, the bible of the recording industry (speaking of religion), the October 11, 2003 edition. According to the sales figures, the recording industry has sold 411,067,000 CDs so far this year. We are talking billions of dollars in revenue here so please don't be shedding any tears for the RIAA.

Now that is against a total of 435,846,000 sold last year at this time for a drop of 5.7%. So all this hand-wringing and whining is the result of a barely 6% drop in sales from the year before. Just about every other industry has experienced a drop in revenue during this economy. So why is the recording industry so special? Why isn't the computer industry getting sympathy because less people bought new computers this year?

BTW, DVD sales are through the roof. Especially music DVDS - which aren't counted in the CD sales I mentioned earlier. I've bought several music DVDs this year and I consider them a good value for all that they offer. Perhaps if the recording industry offered a more compelling product than two or three decent songs wrapped around a bunch of album filler, and throw in some music videos and other extras for good measure, they'd sell a lot more CDs too.

4 posted on 10/12/2003 3:23:29 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (212.4 (-87.6) Homestretch to 200)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
So going by this logic,you can steal hip hop,slut-pop and left wing rock.What about music/musicians that you actually respected,would anyone here make the moral distinction and buy instead of steal on that basis?
5 posted on 10/12/2003 3:30:24 AM PDT by armed_in_sydney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armed_in_sydney
I don't believe that is what Byfield is arguing, he is just mocking the hypocracy of the record companies. As far as the buy/steal thing goes; I confess I would love to hear some of the aging rock leftos come out and explain why capitalism is good for cds but bad for everything else.
6 posted on 10/12/2003 4:56:30 AM PDT by Cdnexpat (Mr Bush, please don't speak to any member of a Liberal government on any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
This is exactly what I've been saying. They've become the victim of the counter culture they conceived and continue to promote. Like the story of Frankenstein.
7 posted on 10/12/2003 5:11:19 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armed_in_sydney
So going by this logic,you can steal hip hop,slut-pop and left wing rock.What about music/musicians that you actually respected,would anyone here make the moral distinction and buy instead of steal on that basis?

Sorry, but when a person has a cancer it kills the entire body, not just the organ that started it...when a culture contains filth, such as what has become pop music, the entire culture suffers not just the music genre.

And our suffering has only begun...

8 posted on 10/12/2003 5:19:37 AM PDT by joyful1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
Morality on the gold standard.
9 posted on 10/12/2003 7:11:40 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
The music industry, however, is only the first sector to find itself so ensnared. There will certainly be others. Capitalism, whether you consider it good or bad - and I consider it good - is very much the product of Protestant Christianity. One of its first apologists, Adam Smith, knew that it would function properly only when combined with a strong moral authority.

Taken to the logical conclusion, those who write and publish songs favored by this 'immoral' sub-culture will lose since their audience will not buy their product, but only steal it, hence no profits. Those who write (and publish) songs favored by the 'moral' sub-culture will survive because their songs WILL be legally purchased.

10 posted on 10/12/2003 1:18:06 PM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cdnexpat
bump
11 posted on 10/12/2003 1:20:50 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nosofar
In an economic model that is what would likely happen. In the real world there are a lot of other factors. To download any amount of material you need your own computer, a high speed internet connection and a cd burner. Not everyone has these things. Quality is a factor in downloads, it would be difficult to get all the songs from any but the the most popular cds. Many people may own all a bands released music but are searching for rare material or bootlegged concert material. So other factors come into play as well as straight up honesty. But even in the real world, those with honest fans should fare out better than those without. The record companies emply that ever downloaded song is a lost sale, but that is not entirely true, many people would download a song they would never buy. If it is free it is worth having but it isn't worth spending money on.
12 posted on 10/12/2003 4:25:55 PM PDT by Cdnexpat (Mr Bush, please don't speak to any member of a Liberal government on any topic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson