Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right_in_Virginia
By whom?

By the mainstream media. Yeah, yeah, I know. What do we care? The media has been flailing at Rush for a decade and a half, and what has it gotten them?

This time they have an issue that has bite to it. They'll portray this a a typical bigwig moneybags hypocrite caught in the same kind of conduct he has railed against in the past. Hey, they'll think, it worked against Newt Gingrich, right? Prepare for the onslaught. Every mention of Rush in the mainsteam media will be prefaced or appended with a reference to his stay in rehab or his addiction to strong painkillers. Every comment he makes about a rat candidate will be brushed aside with some joking comment along the lines of "Why doesn't Rush just stick to what he knows best and talk about illegally obtained drugs?"

This is going to ding his credibility. To think that it won't is probably not realistic.

95 posted on 10/11/2003 8:16:59 PM PDT by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Denver Ditdat
By the mainstream media. Yeah, yeah, I know. What do we care? The media has been flailing at Rush for a decade and a half, and what has it gotten them? This time they have an issue that has bite to it.

True enough. But, if Rush becomes their focus, does this mean they'll back off Bush?

If not, then "backfire" is possible.

120 posted on 10/11/2003 8:31:56 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson