Basically, Consort, your mission appears to be to hurt people when they're down. There's no question that Rush must face the consequences of his actions, but you're seeking to damage him beyond whatever "sin" he's committed.
I'll guarantee you that when he kicks this thing he's going to be stonger and more persuasive than ever. And that will shoot your "damaged goods" argument to hell. Instead of acting all embarassed when conservative spokespersons and leaders show feet of clay, why don't you grow a spine?
Basically, Consort, your mission appears to be to hurt people when they're down. There's no question that Rush must face the consequences of his actions, but you're seeking to damage him beyond whatever "sin" he's committed.Wrong. My statement that you can't seem to deal with was:
"Rush and Bill Bennett are damages goods, at least for the time being. It always looks worse for those who are perceived to be purist ideoloques."
Now, what part of that is not correct?
I'll guarantee you that when he kicks this thing he's going to be stonger and more persuasive than ever.
You can't guarantee anything but, as a long-time Rush listener, I hope that is the case.
And that will shoot your "damaged goods" argument to hell.
No, it won't. At present, he is damaged goods. Get over it.
Instead of acting all embarassed when conservative spokespersons and leaders show feet of clay, why don't you grow a spine?
It appears that you are the embarrassed one.