To: Carry_Okie
Well, we'll see, I guess. The basic problems are obvious enough that even the slowest and stupidest Democrat should be able to figure it out by now - or maybe I'm too generous ;)
I think you're spot-on in desiring nuclear generation - the state of California is overly dependent on natural gas for its power, and natural gas is awfully volatile, obviously. Unfortunately, I think it'll be a cold, cold day in hell before the greenies allow something like that to happen....
88 posted on
11/04/2003 7:19:59 AM PST by
general_re
("I am Torgo. I take care of the place while the Master is away.")
To: general_re; Carry_Okie
Why not ressurect the plans for Diablo Canyon units 3 & 4?
89 posted on
11/04/2003 7:23:31 AM PST by
snopercod
(My Indian name is "Runs With Chainsaw".)
To: general_re; Dog Gone
There is now breakthrough technology in nuclear that might get the public to accept it. The Japanese, I believe it was Hitachi, have produced a modular, sealed, intrinsically, safe reactor cooled by sodium in gravitational convection. There isn't enough fissile material in the thing for it to melt down. There is no steam. It is SMALL, a power plant would easily fit on a half city block. They build a concrete silo and drop it in ready to go. When it's done in fifty years, pull it from the silo intact and replace it.
It's clean, efficient, cheap, fast, and safe.
90 posted on
11/04/2003 7:29:03 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly stupid.)
To: general_re; Carry_Okie; snopercod; Dog Gone; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert357; dalereed; ...
103 posted on
11/04/2003 3:53:38 PM PST by
SierraWasp
(Multi-Level Government is more ABSURD than Multi-Level Marketing! The pyramid's upside down!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson