Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Wing Professor
if people were forbidden to propose ethical ideas they themselves don't live by, then ethics would be impossible.

This reminds me of something...

I remember once plowing through Kierkegaard ("Fear and Trembling," I think), and he talked about the positive aspects of hypocrisy. The ability to sense hypocrisy in oneself was a necessary precursor to ethical self-correction.

I've always thought that was a pretty good insight.


313 posted on 10/10/2003 1:35:53 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
I was going to add that that hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue, so I went to google to try to find out who originally said it. I found it attributed to Matthew Arnold (many times), La Rochefoucauld (many times), Ambrose Bierce, Voltaire, Montaigne, Meher Baba, and Alan Keyes, and then I stopped looking. If every bozo on the net is repeating a cliche and blaming it on the wrong person, it's time to give it up.

But I did find an interesting variation, by Richard John Neuhaus. "It used to be that hypocrisy was the tribute that vice paid to virtue, whereas now it is the charge that vice hurls at virtue". Those calling Rush a hypocrite might consider that one.

403 posted on 10/10/2003 2:17:23 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor (not the author of 'hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson