To: Chancellor Palpatine
I never took him to be particularly harsh on people with "troubles" and I don't see his drug addiction or his statement this afternoon as inconsistent with his previously stated views.
Just because he's a addicted to painkillers doesn't mean he's not against drugs. I'm sure lots of people do things that they are ordinarily against, and would advise their children and other people against doing. I believe you can be against something and still do it anyway. Nobody likes being addicted--to anything.
He says he's taking full responsibility for his addiction and is nobody's victim. That sounds like Rush to me.
108 posted on
10/10/2003 12:40:36 PM PDT by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: wimpycat; Chancellor Palpatine
There is a difference between Rush's criticism of Marion Berry and his current situation. Marion Berry was busted for cocaine, IIRC. Cocaine's been illegal for decades, and everyon knows it's easy to get hooked. Marion Berry was also in public office when he got busted.
Rush's drugs were prescribed by a doctor, and as such, they were legal. The doctor has some responsibility in all this as well - when prescribing the painkillers, he ought to do his darndest to make sure that the patient does not get hooked on `em. In Rush's case, there was a failure on that part.
149 posted on
10/10/2003 12:48:55 PM PDT by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
To: wimpycat
I believe you can be against something and still do it anyway.Very Clintonesque.
448 posted on
10/10/2003 2:54:12 PM PDT by
Jonathon Spectre
(Nazis believed they were doing good.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson