To: Cicero
If the story was completely false, he could have easily said so. There would be no legal ramifications for him.
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
If the story was completely false, he could have easily said soDidja ever hear the saying "give em enough rope and . . ."? No? I wouldn't want to try and defend the NatEnq when this turns out to be B.S.
Way too many posts are saying in essence "Come clean, Rush. We will support you." I'm saying flatly "I support you Rush". Until these accusations are proven (which aint gonna happen) Rush should continue playing out the rope.
77 posted on
10/09/2003 8:40:55 PM PDT by
Don Carlos
(El que no le gusta vino es un amimal.)
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
you are right!!!!!!!!!!if he had done nothing he wouldn't have to keep the counsel of his lawyers....he justs says i don't do illegal drugs,i don't buy illegal drugs,and i don't give money to drug dealers.....he did something,we just don't know how bad it is....
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
YOU NEVER HAVE EXPLAIN WHAT YOU DON'T SAY.
- in or out of court, as the accused or plaintiff.
Anything Rush could say would only be another headline.
Semester after semester of law school classes teach rules of evidence. Common sense does not apply.
268 posted on
10/09/2003 11:11:54 PM PDT by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson