Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIA'S TRUE INTENTIONS TOWARDS AMERICA
My own interview on jrnyquist.com ^ | 10-09-2003 | Honza Malina

Posted on 10/09/2003 7:48:25 PM PDT by Honza Malina

Biographical background

Petr Cibulka was born in 1950 in the city of Brno, in the province of Moravia. As a five-time political prisoner, Mr. Cibulka did hard time in the toughest communist prison camp in Czechoslovakia. He was repeatedly jailed between 1979 and 1989 and conducted a 31-day hunger strike in 1979.

In 1991 Mr. Cibulka began publishing his paper, Uncensored News, opposing the "official" informational blockade organized by the communists through their "soft" control of the mass media. In 1992 Mr. Cibulka acquired and published data from secret police files, including the names of over 200,000 communist spies and collaborators. Subsequently he became a target of aggressive attacks from "former" communist officials. --------

Interview

Do you think that America really won in Iraq ?

America will win in Iraq only if she succeeds in installing a republican form of government similar to that of the American Founding Fathers. This will change Iraq into one of the freest and therefore one of the most prosperous countries on this planet. If the United States, on the other hand, helps to install the type of false democracy that exists in post-communist Europe, then America will have lost the war and missed her lifetime opportunity to change, in her favor, the balance of power between free societies on the one hand and the manipulated so-called "democratic" societies on the other hand.

Let us analyze today's situation in Iraq. The country is divided, as the post-WW2 Germany, into 3 sectors (American, British and Polish); so the American influence, and the possibility of establishing an American-type constitution for Iraq is fundamentally limited because Iraq is divided and the "communists" (represented by Poland) have a piece of the pie. Do you agree with this analysis?

Yes. I can't imagine that the type of republic established by the American Founding Fathers would be implemented in Iraq by the post-communist Polish military who think freedom is a kind of fairy tale. One should also consider that the UK is led by the leftist, Tony Blair, who calls Russia's KGB colonel president, Vladimir Putin, "my friend Vladimir." Such a person is not well suited to teach freedom in Iraq.

What's the situation in Czech Republic today after numerous scandals involving former Czech Minister of Foreign Affairs and now the chairman of the UN General Assembly, Jan Kavan (an alleged communist STB agent code name "Kato" with STB file number 11777 / 307 from 01-22-1969 and also STB file # 12402 / 332 from 05-31-1975 -- as related in the book Jan "Kato" Kavan - story of the real man, by Premysl Vachalovsky and John Bok, J.W. Hill Publishing, Olomouc - Czech Republic 2000 - HM) and also how do you see the "official" STB files now released and published by the Czech Government? What can you tell us about that?

These files were published with 13 years of delay and these "official" files have only a third of the names we published. I've written an extensive analysis of the government's release of the "complete" files in which I demonstrated that it is the biggest fraud committed on the Czech people since the false and supposedly anti-communist revolution with its equally false privatization of the people's state assets in 1989, which entirely fell into the hands of the communists. The Czech Government just recently released files again, after about four months, with an additional 9000 names. So after four months "all of a sudden" they found another 9000 communist criminals from the STB secret communist police. But experts, like historian Radek Schovanek, are arguing that an additional 20,000 names will still be missing in these government-issued STB files. And we are not even talking about the Czechoslovak communist military intelligence services that were not included in the law that forced the government to publish these files in the first place. The communist military intelligence services were a major weapon of communism against the Free World and mainly against the United States as the #1 enemy of communism to this day. These communist military intelligence structures are still kept hidden by the government. Czechoslovak military espionage was directly connected to Russian GRU military espionage and I'm convinced that the Zs [Czech military intelligence] is still working for the GRU to this day.

Regarding the case of Jan Kavan [recently elected president of the UN General Assembly], this man is of great interest to all anti-communists since 1990. Since 1991 we know about his proven co-operation with the communist secret police, the STB. Despite these revelations, there are still powers in the Czech Republic and also outside the country that keep Jan Kavan in every post of power and influence that is possible for him to achieve. The high point of his political career is his chairmanship of the UN General Assembly at the time when a copy of his STB file is a literary bestseller on the Czech market since 2000. [It is widely asserted in the Czech Republic that the BIS-STB police went out to buy as many copies of the Jan "Kato" Kavan book as possible so the Czech people wouldn't have a chance to read it. - HM note].

It's unbelievable that after the publishing of Jan Kavan's STB file in the Czech Republic, effectively proving his co-operation and the extent of his co-operation with the communist secret police, that there's no power in the UN that would stop Jan Kavan's becoming the president of the UN General Assembly; and it is a shame that nobody has expressed interest in translating his police file to publish it outside the Czech Republic.

I also don't understand why the United States is not playing a more active role to stop infiltration of the world's leading institutions by communist agents.

[HM note: This is to give readers some idea of the details of Kavan's past. In 1976 Kavan got arrested in Belgium for drug smuggling. He also admitted to have connections in England with Mr. Zajicek, code name "Zachystal," from the First Department of the STB -- foreign espionage -- born 08-29-1932. Kavan's mother, Jean Edwards-Kavan, co-operated with the Second department of the Czechoslovak Ministry of Interior specializing on Great Britain between 1959-1967. It is therefore hardly surprising that 18-year-old Jan Kavan became a member of the Czechoslovak Communist Party despite the fact that his father was arrested, convicted and sentenced to 25 years in prison during the reign of the Stalinist, Klement Gottwald.] ------------ ....continues here:http://www.jrnyquist.com/cibulka_2003_0905.htm

(Excerpt) Read more at jrnyquist.com ...


TOPICS: Russia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Honza Malina
The process starts with US. Citizens must defend their right to self determination and follow constitutional law to remove communists from our government and institutions.
21 posted on 10/09/2003 9:49:29 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Honza Malina
"The country is divided, as the post-WW2 Germany, into 3 sectors..."

I thought Germany was divided into four.

22 posted on 10/10/2003 12:00:55 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noswad
You are a NWO conspiracist

And you whine about "ad hominem" attacks?

I sent Nyquist a polite email pointing out a significant flaw in his scenario. The flaw was that in order for the Russian to succeed, the US military would have to disregard its extant doctrine and procedures without any discernable reason for doing so. This was in an area of operations that would not be influenced by the national command authority--the events in question would be over, one way or the other, before the NCA was even aware of what was going on. I quoted relevant portions of US military doctrine and also gave references to Congressional testimony and scholarly works on the topic.

I cannot reprint Mr. Nyquist's response in a family forum.

and your agenda was EXPOSED by nyquist through email correspondence.

My agenda has been, and will remain, to provide my honest opinion, backed by fact. Nyquist didn't like the facts that I raised.

Somehow you think your creative game has merit over someone who has lived through communism?

Communist governments lied to their citizens--and to themselves--as a matter of course. I'm supposed to suddenly accept what one government told its citizenry as gospel truth?

23 posted on 10/10/2003 9:46:37 AM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Suggesting you are a NWO conspiracist isn't ad hominem-- especially in light of the fact that you are.

Second, you present an argument that would indicate that you are lying. You are telling me that your written theory above was responded to by Nyquist in such a way that it was too vulger to post in this forum? Not likely.

Third, your so-called flaw doesn't make any sense. For Russia to suceed the US military would have to disregard its doctrine? How about defeat? Don't you THINK that maybe Russia has a mind to defeat the US military in the scenario? If you think Perestroika did not affect our military doctrine as well as our focus on human and signal intelligence you are sadly mistaken... as a former Marine yourself you must know the shift that took place between 1979 and 1993.

24 posted on 10/10/2003 10:18:04 AM PDT by Noswad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Let me clarify on the NWO conspiracist... if you thought I was suggesting you are part of the conspiracy, then it could be considered ad hominem... BUT instead, I'm suggesting that you believe in the skull-n-bones conspiracy and this is largely what your problem with nyquist is who does not believe in such nonsense...
25 posted on 10/10/2003 10:22:16 AM PDT by Noswad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Noswad
Suggesting you are a NWO conspiracist isn't ad hominem-- especially in light of the fact that you are.

Since you have NOT established that as proven fact, it's ad hominem.

Second, you present an argument that would indicate that you are lying.

If you don't like it, get a hotmail account and present a detailed rebuttal of a Nyquist column.

You are telling me that your written theory above was responded to by Nyquist in such a way that it was too vulger to post in this forum? Not likely.

Who'd believe that Gray Davis cusses like a stable boy and physically abuses his staff, just from the persona he presents on the campaign trail?

Third, your so-called flaw doesn't make any sense. For Russia to suceed the US military would have to disregard its doctrine?

Yes. That's what I said. Basically, the US military would have to sit there and LET the Russians do what they wanted for over twenty minutes.

How about defeat?

If ANYTHING goes wrong in Nyquist's scenario, the Russians have a small problem: they've gone nuclear against a nuclear power, but they have NOT succeeded in destroying all US nuclear forces, and the remainder of those forces will likely be aimed at...better sit down here...the people who actually started the damn war.

Don't you THINK that maybe Russia has a mind to defeat the US military in the scenario?

They may WANT to do so. But the proposed strategy doesn't provide a plausible theory of victory unless every US military officer is a turncoat traitor.

If you think Perestroika did not affect our military doctrine as well as our focus on human and signal intelligence you are sadly mistaken... as a former Marine yourself you must know the shift that took place between 1979 and 1993.

We still watch the Russians--and particularly their nuclear forces--VERY closely, simply because they still have the ability to destroy the US as a national polity.

26 posted on 10/10/2003 10:54:42 AM PDT by Poohbah ("[Expletive deleted] 'em if they can't take a joke!" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Noswad; Honza Malina; DarkWaters; JudgemAll

A bump from the clutches of thread oblivion....


27 posted on 08/31/2004 11:05:23 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

Bump.


28 posted on 09/17/2004 5:09:19 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD

bump.


29 posted on 05/09/2005 11:49:12 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson