[STFrancis]

The more I think about it... She doesn't have to PROVE it... she was asking a QUESTION and could have asked HYPOTHECIALLY . However, she achieved her whole goal... It's in ALL the papers etc.. She has sown DOUBT. Espescially if the judge doesn't allow any of her history to be presented. In a way she is already tainting the jury pool for her purposes. The judge now is going to tell her to not do it again BUT she has already what she wanted... Created doubt by using the nuts and sluts defense....

[Peach]

Exactly. If the defense doesn't use this 3 men/3 day defense again, we will know the Judge at least sanctioned her and possibly will enter her name to the Bar Association for more serious charges.

Additionally, this morning at 10:05 on FNC, a black prosecutor (didn't catch his name) was in the courtroom yesterday and he said the Judge did not allow certain testimony heard AT THIS TIME because it was so damaging to Kobe Bryant that it would make getting an impartial jury pool impossible.