To: per loin
I was initially amazed at the fact the defense didn't waive the eharing. Then I heard a talking head on one of the news nets this morning suggest that the defense was going to use the prelim as a way of arguing that the jury pool in Eagle Cty was too tainted to be fair. The defense allows the prelim, argues that the locals are too biased, and innoculates every other possible jury pool by getting the shick values info out early. I'm beginning to buy this explanation.
16 posted on
10/09/2003 2:18:17 PM PDT by
mewzilla
To: mewzilla
"jury pool"
Did you hear her so-called "friends" right after this broke news?
I think she herself can't get a fair trial in that town...
29 posted on
10/09/2003 2:23:34 PM PDT by
Shermy
(Tiger Week On Free Republic)
To: mewzilla
I was initially amazed at the fact the defense didn't waive the eharing. Then I heard a talking head on one of the news nets this morning suggest that the defense was going to use the prelim as a way of arguing that the jury pool in Eagle Cty was too tainted to be fair. The defense allows the prelim, argues that the locals are too biased, and innoculates every other possible jury pool by getting the shick values info out early. I'm beginning to buy this explanation.That may very well be the defense theory. They may also want to lock in the officer's testimony right now, for some reason that would only become apparent to us later.
58 posted on
10/09/2003 2:37:09 PM PDT by
colorado tanker
(Oddball: "A . . . tank can give you an . . . edge.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson