To: MEG33
I could have sworn that at the very begining of this, on Crossfire, I heard Bob Novak say that if the FBI asked him, he would divulge his sources.
What does it say about "journalists" when on the one hand they rail about illegal activities, and on the other concel them FOR THEIR OWN BENEFIT?? Because you know that Novak, who supposedly has knowledge of a crime, is only refusing to protect his sources, who may, in fact, be the actual criminal!
22 posted on
10/09/2003 8:37:00 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: Howlin
I haven't heard him say it,but if he divulges the name to the FBI, we won't hear of it because of the criminal investigation.
31 posted on
10/09/2003 8:47:31 AM PDT by
MEG33
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson