Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: Bigger than Watergate
The Spectator (U.K.) ^
| 10/11/03
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 10/09/2003 8:11:35 AM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
To: Dog
And think who they are at war with...
Not Bin Laden.....but the President of the United States......amazing huh?
What is so amazing is that the "watchdog press" is totally
ignoring this obvious truth for their own
political purposes.
The enemy is within.
61
posted on
10/09/2003 10:33:32 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
( Clinton met with Monica more than he did his CIA director.)
To: shhrubbery!
It wasn't Larry Johnson.It was someone who went through class with her.Larry J is a dunce..A PBS kinda guy.I agree that a faction in the CIA is after Bush.
62
posted on
10/09/2003 10:34:30 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Howlin; Pokey78; MEG33; MizSterious; All
Thanks for the ping. I think Steyn, who is a brilliant analyst of the current political scene, is very close to the truth in this column. I don't think any observant person with an IQ above that of warm beer would fail to miss what the Wilson affair says about the CIA. Frankly, it's terrifying in a post-9/11 world. What I keep wondering is why President Bush continues to tolerate Tenet when the man has been a dramatic failure just this year alone.
Although I absolutely adore President Bush and would virtually walk through fire for him, he is a human being subject to all the human failings as the rest of us. Is it possible that his famous sense of loyalty is misplaced as regards Tenet? Or is it more a matter of there just being too much on the President's plate the last couple of years for him to want to bring in a new CIA director? Or is it something else? Not even having an inkling is deeply worrisome precisely because of what Steyn concludes:
"If sending Joseph C. Wilson IV to Niger for a week is the best the worlds only hyperpower can do, thats a serious problem. If the Company knew it was a joke all along, thats a worse problem. It means Mr Bush is in the same position with the CIA as General Musharraf is with Pakistans ISI: when he makes a routine request, he has to figure out whether theyre going to use it to try and set him up. This is no way to win a terror war."
63
posted on
10/09/2003 10:39:21 AM PDT
by
Wolfstar
(NO SECURITY = NO ECONOMY)
To: piasa; Grampa Dave; seamole; mrustow; Sabertooth; Miss Marple; Reb Raider; MizSterious; Endeavor; ..
This is the Plame Name Blame Game ping list.
Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
You may also find all posts to this ping list by searching on keyword PLAMENAMEBLAMEGAME.
Note this is a HIGH-VOLUME ping list!
Please ping me to any Plame/Wilson threads!
There is no way I can catch them all myself!!
64
posted on
10/09/2003 10:41:05 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Pokey78
Thanks for posting. With the sad death of Michael Kelly, Mark Steyn has become my favorite.
I'm currently reading BUSH VS. THE BUREACRACY by Laurie Mylorie, and it's chilling to realize the possibility that there IS cooked intelligence coming out of the CIA and State Department, but that it's cooked in a way to undermine the War on Terror.
65
posted on
10/09/2003 10:45:10 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: MEG33
Hmmmm...a Freeper on another thread that we could not fire the CIA because they were covered under the Pendleton Act, which at first I believed, but this conflicting comment from camas compelled me to search out the real truth and it shows they definitely are not...
It was given (1949) special powers under the Central Intelligence Act: the director may spend agency funds without accounting for them; the size of its staff is secret; and employees, exempt from civil service procedures, may be hired, investigated, or dismissed as the CIA sees fit.
Fact Monster
Okay...so now I guess I can go back to my original statement...FIRE THEM ALL AND START OVER!
To: jpl
Most of these people unfortunately can't be fired, because they're members of the federal employee union.I kept hearing conflicting statements on this, so I did a search. CIA employees cannot join a union...
Employees with direct national security duties, including the military, CIA and FBI, are barred from union membership.
USA Today Article
To: Howlin
In the ----" Set up? Anatomy of the contrived Wilson "scandal"" it says---
Before he left Niger, Wilson said he briefed the ambassador on his findings. After returning to Washington...he provided "a detailed briefing to the CIA [and]...the State Department African Affairs Bureau. There was nothing secret or earth-shattering in my report, just as there was nothing secret about my trip...
Though I did not file a written report..." I've felt this was not an 'official WH request - one more contrived by Wilson and friends.
68
posted on
10/09/2003 11:08:05 AM PDT
by
malia
To: Pokey78
Great characterization:
Wilson comes over like a total flake not a sober striped-pants diplomat but a shaggy-maned ideologically driven kook whose hippie-lyric quotes make a lot more sense than his neocon-bashing diatribes for leftie dronefests like the Nation.Steyn is a one-man truth squad. The Administration would do well making him the White House spokesman, replacing that nice, but weak, Scott McClellan (no doubt related to Gen. George B. McClellan), or to at least require McClellan to simply read Steyn's columns as the official White House statement of the day.
69
posted on
10/09/2003 11:21:00 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
Comment #70 Removed by Moderator
To: KantianBurke
Whoever had the bright idea to send this idiot over to Nigeria on such an important and delicate matter needs to be fired.Well, I guess that would be Wilson's wife.
71
posted on
10/09/2003 11:21:55 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: KantianBurke
Now, that's the nub of the matter. Tenet? Ultimately, this Clinton hold-over needs to take responsibility for the way his agency is undermining the expressed policy of the President of the United States.
72
posted on
10/09/2003 11:23:52 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: MEG33
we won't hear of it because of the criminal investigation. Has it even been established that a crime was committed?
73
posted on
10/09/2003 11:28:31 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: Dog
And think who they are at war with... Not Bin Laden.....but the President of the United States......amazing huh? Didn't this used to be called "treason"? I guess nothing's changed since the days of Alger Hiss. Where is Joe McCarthy when we need him?
74
posted on
10/09/2003 11:33:31 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: My2Cents
We won't know until the criminal investigation is over!!Sigh...which just breeds rumors.
75
posted on
10/09/2003 11:36:00 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: ravingnutter
Thank you, I stand corrected on that. I'd bet that it's probably still very difficult to fire FBI and CIA employees though, barring some sort of criminal behavior or other serious malfeasance.
76
posted on
10/09/2003 11:41:18 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: moodyskeptic
Exactly what do our J schools teach? Marxism and political correctness. This began in the late 1950s and has steadily gotten worse. Big schools like Missouri and Columbia have always been ultra left-wing.
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
FYI
78
posted on
10/09/2003 1:07:55 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: KantianBurke
Talk about an understatement! Whoever had the bright idea to send this idiot over to Nigeria on such an important and delicate matter needs to be fired. ASAP. Well, that depends on whether or not this bright idea was accompanied by an equally bright idea to use this buffoon as a cover for a real intel operation.
If Wilson was just a cover, then this thing blowing up into a big hoo-raw has to be counted as a definite plus for the intel guys.
79
posted on
10/09/2003 1:11:38 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: hopespringseternal
It must drive the left crazy that they so thoroughly infiltrated this nation's institutions, right down to reducing the intelligence apparatus to a sad joke, and still lost the cold war. The CIA was taken by surprise when the Soviet Union collapsed. I do not know where they spend their $30 billion dollar budget each year. (That is over $80 million dollars every DAY.)
80
posted on
10/09/2003 1:18:16 PM PDT
by
maica
(...as Davis rides the mudslide, it's Arnold by a landslide next Tuesday.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson