Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
"There's no lengths to which they won't go,” said Sandy Rios of Concerned Women for America. “And of course it undermines traditional marriage and we cannot allow them to do that."

Fine. Too bad she has no intention of working to repaal no fault divorce laws, which is what have weakend traditional marriage to the point where it is actually endangered by the other side. This is like someone decrying the weeds in the front yard while the foundation of the house is caving in.

9 posted on 10/09/2003 8:05:15 AM PDT by Orangedog (Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Orangedog
Absolutely! We didn't arrive at this situation by Star Trek transporter, but through a long series of legal decisions and social adjustments reflecting the fact that people don't wish to be bound by traditional moral requirements. Anyone who objects to the acceptance of homosexual couples is inconsistent unless he also objects to fornication, heterosexual cohabitation, divorce and remarriage, and the whole range of issues where heterosexuals have given themselves a pass for two generations.
24 posted on 10/09/2003 8:59:24 AM PDT by Tax-chick (No refunds, no exchanges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson