Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E Rocc
A bit later, the statement says that the group only supports Biblical law for a nation that covenants together. That would pretty much nullify any attempt at Christianizing the citizens then if they are not going to use God's law until the citizens want to do so; at that point, the citizenry would be Christian anyway so not much "Christianizing" would be going on.
420 posted on 10/09/2003 11:52:10 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas
A bit later, the statement says that the group only supports Biblical law for a nation that covenants together. That would pretty much nullify any attempt at Christianizing the citizens then if they are not going to use God's law until the citizens want to do so; at that point, the citizenry would be Christian anyway so not much "Christianizing" would be going on.
How do they define the citizens "wanting" to use the Theonomist version of God's law? 50.1%? 67% of the legislature and 3/4 of the states? 99%? 100% will never happen in a practical sense.

-Eric

424 posted on 10/09/2003 12:33:54 PM PDT by E Rocc (Browns 33, Steelers 13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson