Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chancellor Palpatine
If you are going to say that Claremont is a bit player, then you can't say that McClintock should have known about Ahmanson because of his involvement with Claremont.

Once again, you have demonstrated to me that Ahmanson is not someone I would be comfortable with. You have yet to give me a reason to be uncomfortable with Claremont, nor a reason to be uncomfortable with those who worked for Claremont.

Frankly, if we are going to demonize Claremont, then you have to also demonize Heritage (since they work together often), and so forth. After all, by your logic they should all know about everything, including that they are just a tool for this Ahmanson character.

So, what percentage of Claremont's funding comes from Ahmanson?

265 posted on 10/08/2003 7:30:22 PM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
I don't care about Claremont, nor was it the focus of my research. The only reason it came up was because Ahmanson was a donor, and McC worked there a time. The simple fact of the matter is that there is no way that McClintock didn't know what Ahmanson was about - and that is my focus right now.
272 posted on 10/08/2003 7:37:09 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson