McClintock, who employs Stoos as his deputy campaign manager and until recently paid him $93,720 a year as his top legislative analyst, said in an interview last week that he was unaware of Stoos' writings.Nevertheless, Stoos wrote about an anti-abortion city council disobeying the law of the land in February of this year:"I completely disagree," McClintock said, with Stoos' vision of the anti-abortion city council and "completely reject" the idea that the nation's modern laws should be biblical.
What if. . .
Perhaps some brave school boards would inspire the same type of action in other lesser magistrates like city council members or state legislators. I dream of the day when a strong Christian majority is elected to a city council somewhere in America.This council could then pass a resolution declaring that abortion is now illegal in their city. Of course, the city attorney would quickly tell them that they cannot do this, at which point he should be fired and a good prolife attorney should be hired to replace him.
Next up would be the police chief, who would likely say he could not enforce such a law. Again, the council should accept his letter of resignation and hire someone who would enforce the law.
This is exactly what John Calvin expected lesser magistrates — that is "any magistrates of the people, appointed to restrain the willfulness of kings" — to do, to hold those above them accountable. In this case the state or federal officials would have to decide what they were going to do with this city that chose to protect its unborn residents.
If they came to those members and said you must allow abortion in your city because it "is the law of the land," then the council members could rightly and with all Biblical authority respond to the state or federal officials by saying, "whom should we obey, God or man?" The council members are empowered by their office to do what I as a private individual am forbidden to do, that is, hold these erring magistrates accountable.
John Stoos--Christian Reconstructionist and "one of the most astute Republican political strategists in California"--when speaking to Jerry Sloan, co-founder of the Tocsin Foundation.
Why on earth should anyone assume that McClintock had read what he wrote? Was it in the USA Today? Was it reported in the local papers? Was it in National Review? Or was it on some fringe group's newsletter that hardly anyone had ever read?
This is the jump that many seem to be making that I am having a hard time understanding why it should be made.