To: Aegedius
"Bush and Rice and Rumsfled confirmed two weeks ago that Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11
Wrong. They said that there was insufficient evidence to prove the connection. "
Okay, for the less-logically inclined here (me) - please explain how the 2 statements are so different as to make the first statement "wrong". I think they can both be correct & not mutually exclusive.
To: familyofman
Okay, for the less-logically inclined here (me) - please explain how the 2 statements are so different as to make the first statement "wrong". I think they can both be correct & not mutually exclusive. Compare it to the difference between an acquittal and charges being dropped for lack of evidence.
56 posted on
10/08/2003 7:27:35 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Cure Arnold of groping - throw him into a dark closet with Janet Reno and shut the door.)
To: familyofman
They don't know whether Saddam had anything to do with 9/11, and stated that. He may have had no connection, but it is false to state that Rice, Bush and Cheney have said there is no connection. They didn't say that.
They don't know. And I don't know. And you don't know.
58 posted on
10/08/2003 7:32:32 AM PDT by
Aegedius
(Money can buy happiness. Money can buy love. Money can't buy class.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson