Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems: New Recall in 100 Days
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/08/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/07/2003 9:16:27 PM PDT by kattracks

California Democrat Party state spokesman Bob Mulholland said his party is giving Arnold Schwarzenegger just 100 days before a new recall effort may be launched.

Mulholland made his threat on Fox News Tuesday night after polls closed and major press outlets declared Arnold Schwarzenegger the winner.

On Tuesday, Gray Davis declined to refute reports that he may back a new recall effort against Schwarzenegger.

Already press reports indicate that Democrats have $3 million prepared for a new recall effort.

Also, Hollywood billionaire Stephen Bing has promised to finance any Democratic-backed recall effort.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bobmulholland; davisrecall; desperatedems; dirtytricks; governorarnold; recall2; soreloserman; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-236 next last
To: xdem
She'll fight very, very dirty because she figures she has to win to have any political future.

She'll fight very, very dirty because that's the only way she and her husband know how to fight.

161 posted on 10/08/2003 2:08:08 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
They're going to overplay their hand here just like they did at the Funerally in Minnesota in 2002 and the Lost Angeles Times Sleaze Offensive of 2003.

Yup. Right now they are so hate filled and malignant that they are headed for a full scale self immolation in the next election. What can I do to help?
162 posted on 10/08/2003 2:08:57 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
You got that right!
163 posted on 10/08/2003 2:16:34 AM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"The recall is costing millions of dollars! How can we take this money from the people?!?!" There's hardly a Rat in California that isn't ON RECORD bleating out that lie.

Considering that the two Repubs combined got 2/3 of the vote, a recall would be futile.

164 posted on 10/08/2003 2:16:56 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Java/C++/Unix/Web Developer === (Finally employed again! Whoopie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wow....the Dems have all gone crazy.
165 posted on 10/08/2003 2:24:24 AM PDT by The Raven (<==see my home page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
They're right. There should another recall. About 20 to 30 Rat legislators better watch their 6.
166 posted on 10/08/2003 2:53:57 AM PDT by Credo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
how generous, I thought the democrats would only give arnold a full week to fix all the states problems. (/s)
167 posted on 10/08/2003 4:36:50 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Go right ahead Bob ... see what happens. You think that people are fed up with the Dims now ? Just wait till you try to recall Ahrnuld. I personally am looking forward to having a Republican majority in the state house and senate and a Republican governor.

So please Bob pleeease don't attempt to recall Arnuld ... said Briar Rabbit

168 posted on 10/08/2003 4:42:18 AM PDT by clamper1797 (Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
When the Dems realize this, their legislators will all head to a motel in New Mexico to protest.

Please NO! We just finished fumigating the Mariott after the Texans left.

169 posted on 10/08/2003 4:45:12 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (There's two kinds of people in the world. Those with loaded guns and those that dig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Doesn't matter. As easy as it is to get on the recall ballot, to actually get one going you need a lot of signatures and money. The reason this recall election was so extraordinary is that it was so extreme that it actually got to this point.
170 posted on 10/08/2003 4:57:40 AM PDT by Conservative til I die (Scratch an evangelical long enough and you'll uncover a heretic or even a blasphemer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks




Dems: New Recall in 100 Days
BRING IT!

171 posted on 10/08/2003 5:01:26 AM PDT by upchuck (Wanna make the Taglinus FreeRepublicus list? Simple-just jiggle jigsaw with yer credit card number :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; L`enn; BlessedBeGod; InvisibleChurch; ILBBACH; Reactionary; djf; PhiKapMom; ...
I apologize in advance for having a mega-ping, but I wanted to address everyone I could find that said in this thread, in essence, "Let the DemonRATs shoot themselves in the foot again so that their ignorance and stupidity may be on display for all." The 11-year aim of the DemonRATs is to make things so bloody and muddy, regardless of whose blood and mud it is, that there is no such thing as a "middle". Usually, it's worked for them because the "middle" has sat home and allowed the fraud the 'RATs perfected to have a greater effect on the election. While it backfired on them this time, I wouldn't want to continue to depend on that successful strategy given that has been their only method of success in the last 40+ years.
172 posted on 10/08/2003 5:04:42 AM PDT by steveegg (I have one thing to say to the lurkers; FREEPATHON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
California Democrat Party state spokesman Bob Mulholland said his party is giving Arnold Schwarzenegger just 100 days before a new recall effort may be launched.

Bob: We have you surrounded. Put down the crack pipe, step away from the liquor bottle, and come out with your head up.

173 posted on 10/08/2003 5:05:47 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; L`enn; BlessedBeGod; InvisibleChurch; ILBBACH; Reactionary; djf; PhiKapMom; ...
Last sentence, try #2:

While it backfired on them this time, I wouldn't want to continue to depend on that successful strategy backfiring on them given that has been their only method of success in the last 40+ years.

174 posted on 10/08/2003 5:06:15 AM PDT by steveegg (I have one thing to say to the lurkers; FREEPATHON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Methinks there is more than just a "little" concern about this audit the Governator is promising..perahps with a Roto-rooter.....? :)
175 posted on 10/08/2003 5:06:21 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
While it backfired on them this time, I wouldn't want to continue to depend on that successful strategy backfiring on them given that has been their only method of success in the last 40+ years.

While the backfire of the method of success this time continued to be successful, I wouldn't want to backfire the success of methodology depending on the method of giving them their only success of backfiring this time in the successful strategy of continuing in the depending of this success backfiring in the last 40 years.

176 posted on 10/08/2003 5:13:21 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Thanks for putting it all into perspective :-)

I need another can of Dew (either that or 15 more hours of sleep).

177 posted on 10/08/2003 5:19:48 AM PDT by steveegg (I have one thing to say to the lurkers; FREEPATHON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
"How do you excuse “W's" lack of conservatism on so many issues?"

I have been wondering the same thing since he was first elected governor of Texas. I am very glad to see Davis out; it is certainly a step forward for California. By the same token, considering Arnold's liberalism, California can not necessarily be seen as taking a step in the "right" direction.
178 posted on 10/08/2003 5:40:51 AM PDT by Reagan Renaissance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
I could not agree more. Their insane repetition of failed strategies is entertaining, but no excuse for complacency.
179 posted on 10/08/2003 5:42:34 AM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: lizma
"..it's been a long time since they have had to face an intellectual argument and now they can't do it."

If elections were based on intellectual arguments, no Democrat would have been elected anywhere since 1936.
180 posted on 10/08/2003 5:46:52 AM PDT by Reagan Renaissance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson