1 posted on
10/07/2003 5:05:33 PM PDT by
Brian S
To: Brian S
Without the PA, all illegals would be home free. Support it for the security we need at this time.
2 posted on
10/07/2003 5:08:09 PM PDT by
yoe
(Term Limits - and 2 terms are the limit for all elected to a Federal office!!)
To: Mixer
Bump for later reading
3 posted on
10/07/2003 5:08:32 PM PDT by
Mixer
To: All
4 posted on
10/07/2003 5:08:52 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Brian S
waddabunchofidjits
To: Brian S
I would like to take this opportunity to thank Wisconsin for becoming a safe-haven for terrorists. What a bunch of boneheads.
To: Brian S
Hansen said she and her staff do not oppose fighting terrorism but believe the Patriot Act wrongly gives the FBI authority to peruse people's library records. These people certianly do oppose fighting terrorisim. They're destroying records in order to help terrorists.
If the FBI is "wrongly" using such information, then the proper forum to discuss that is in court. These leftist libs are taking things into their own hands out of a misplaced anger at Geo. Bush. If Janet Reno had trumpeted the PA, then they'd love it, and would call the feds at the first sign of David Koresh in the library with the video tape of everything he did.
7 posted on
10/07/2003 5:14:19 PM PDT by
narby
To: Brian S
Librarians are notorious Leftists. Even more than teachers as a group.
8 posted on
10/07/2003 5:14:25 PM PDT by
Az Joe
To: Brian S
Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!
FREEDOM!
There are good and bad ways to do ANYTHING. Excessive intrusive record keeping is a bad way to catch terrorists. A waste of time and destructive to liberty. LIBERTY! Which we should all be zealous to keep safe.
12 posted on
10/07/2003 5:24:48 PM PDT by
bvw
To: Brian S
Even before the PA wouldn't a search warrant allowed law enforcement officers access to the records?
Why is it wrong now, and not before?
To: Brian S
Is this really a problem? What do they have in their circulating collection that would identify an evil doer? Haven't they accomplished nothing more than warn bad guys that they'd better steal the books they want, but not check them out?
20 posted on
10/07/2003 5:43:30 PM PDT by
Tacis
To: Brian S
The librarians need to get a life. I thought they were supposed to be smart and well educated.
To: Brian S
117,000 libraries in America. How many FBI agents? 10,000? How many agents could really be assigned to searching through our library records?
30 posted on
10/07/2003 6:00:17 PM PDT by
NietzschesJoker
(Laughing and staying silent--is that now your whole philosophy?)
To: Brian S
Maybe these oh so patriotic intelligent liberalarians should be destroying the dangerous BOOKS too.
To: Brian S
They are purging records of library users useful to freedom or security? These will only be searched in the process of investigating crimes.
Now the terrorists are on the alert: If they want to use a library, go to a far-left haven, and they can abuse our libraries to their heart's content without getting caught.
46 posted on
10/07/2003 7:24:29 PM PDT by
WOSG
(DONT PUT CALI ON CRUZ CONTROL & VOTE YES ON 54!)
To: Brian S
These records were useful in the Thomas hearings.
55 posted on
10/07/2003 9:41:22 PM PDT by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Brian S
BWAHAHAHA! Terrorists can cross the border without the
feds saying boo to them. But they think they can catch them because they're gonna be stupid enough to look up plans to make bombs on a library computer! There's no fool
like a federal gubmint fool, or the buffoons who support them!
To: Brian S
Psssst....little secret being revealed here....
Terrorists come from middle east TO canada TO UpperPennensula Michigan TO Wisconsin TO...anywhere in USA
Result worse than 9/11 guaranteed!
Too easy it is
74 posted on
10/11/2003 4:45:53 AM PDT by
joyful1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson