Replies

The only problem with "armed conflict" is that based on their own stupid rules and laws, it is only the RIGHT who is ARMED anymore! hehehehehe. Bring em on!

No! Your problem is you believe their rhetoric. Liberals always lie when their lips are moving. They've presided over the gutting of the police forces, and the multiplicity of unregistered guns on the street.

All they have to do is get the word out that there's a riot going down, and looting whitey for everybody, and there will be guns galore. Remember South Central when they were shooting at the fire trucks and the airliners?

If the left wants to unleash hell, they have the ability. Probably more than the average conservative who might have a 9mm or a shotgun for home defense... you wouldn't want to try to come through that guy or gal's door, but they won't be in the street yelling "Burn Baby, Burn" as they set your house on fire either.

All they have to do is get the word out that there's a riot going down, and looting whitey for everybody, and there will be guns galore. Remember South Central when they were shooting at the fire trucks and the airliners?

See my post above. Yes, the next time South Central blows up there will be a lot of guns. So? If you live anywhere reasonable it's not going to be an issue. Look at what wasn't touched in the King riots: Santa Monica, Malibu, West Hollywood, Pacific Pallisades, Glendale, Pamona, etc. etc.

The rules are clear, if really pissed you ignorant serfs may burn your own houses and the few liquor stores in the hood down.

I don't believe that the mob is controlled (conditioned, like in the King verdict, yes) and probably a bunch of people in the hood like Arnold (who they can probabably relate to through his many movie roles) more than they like Davis, who looks like a charicature of "the man". In summary this is not a trigger event.