To: familyofman; aristeides
This reply of your made me wonder:
"I thought Novak outed her as an analyst...If she is undercover and her cover is "an analyst" it seems to me nothing happened "
"If there is nothing to this, someone had better tell the POTUS because he's referring to it as a criminal act.
Aristeides has pointed out this to you on his reply re your above inane reply.
47 posted on
10/07/2003 1:02:35 PM PDT by
Grampa Dave
(Fight Liberalism 24/7/365 for only 17 cents / day. Donate $5 monthly to Free Republic.)
To: Grampa Dave
I thought Novak outed her as an analyst...If she is undercover and her cover is "an analyst" it seems to me nothing happened "
"If there is nothing to this, someone had better tell the POTUS because he's referring to it as a criminal act.
I'm sorry if my previous reply of mine confused you - I may have been too obtuse. I do think it is a serious matter - as does the POTUS & others. But, there seems to be a lot of people here who don't see it that way.
I will try to refrain from being obtuse in the future, even thou that will be difficult since that is my nature. Using reverse logic in a logical way doesn't always work.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson