To: Howlin
This statement jumps out to me.
As to The National Enquirer article, I read it. And I found it to be credible, rife with details that demonstrate the severity of Limbaugh's substance abuse problem.
To: jimmccleod
She's feeling his pain. I simply want to know how he did a radio show with all that junk in his system.
11 posted on
10/07/2003 5:47:21 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: jimmccleod
That would have been my "pick," too, for the most startling.
I read the article myself and I'd hardly use the word "credible."
17 posted on
10/07/2003 5:49:40 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: jimmccleod
This statement also is very presumptive: However, if Limbaugh continues to dabble in drugs, his legion of fans and listeners will slowly drift away.
44 posted on
10/07/2003 6:09:27 AM PDT by
Born Conservative
("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
To: jimmccleod
I have a problem with anyone finding credibility in the National Enquirer, yes some news has come from there, BUT Rush is a major, big-time target that the Libs wanted downed as of yesterday.
To: jimmccleod
As to The National Enquirer article, I read it. And I found it to be credible, rife with details that demonstrate the severity of Limbaugh's substance abuse problem. How could anyone with an ounce of sense find anything credible in the National Enquirer? That statement jumped out at me too.
230 posted on
10/07/2003 7:44:13 PM PDT by
dhfnc
To: jimmccleod
If someone accused you of buying large quantities of painkillers illegally, would you deny it? The fact is that Rush is unwilling to deny buying these pills. Instead, he hired a famous lawyer. That's all we know, and it isn't encouraging.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson