Replies

Which is why listeners like you are ENABLING the DNC to try Rush in the Court of Public Opinion. They use the leftwing media as evidence (Clinton buddies at the National Enquirer) and public desire to be sheep as qualification to jurros.

What overwheling evidence? The only "evidence" has been a picture of a cigar box, a picture of a gas station, the uncorroberated (yes there is no corroberation), the statement to the MERE existence of audio tapes, MERE existence of emails. NOTHING, NOTHING has been linked directly to Rush other than the woman WAS a former employee of Rush.

There IS NO EVIDENCE as yet. NOTHING, nada, zip.

Reverse everything you said. IF there was something, the tapes would be out there. I have heard stories report it was her only, others say rush is on, others say the tapes are uninteligible. Again, there is no proof because it would have been PRODUCED. Same for emails.

TO THE ENQUIRER: IF THERE IS AUDIO TAPE PROOF, PRODUCE IT OR SHUT UP. There is nothing there to produce.

"TO THE ENQUIRER: IF THERE IS AUDIO TAPE PROOF, PRODUCE IT OR SHUT UP. There is nothing there to produce."

Oh..considering today's technology, it wouldn't be hard to produce a "fake tape" of Rush saying whatever they want him too...word, by word, taken right from his program audio archives. (Tinfoil hat on..)

All things considered, it's really all about what is NOT being said, because the media sharks should be on a feeding frenzy and they just aren't. No one is holding press conferences, or giving news briefings or statements, etc. It's mighty quiet out there.

Conclusion? Rush is innocent.