From the GOP USA of all places.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: All
I'M BACK!!!
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD (It's in the Breaking News sidebar!)
2 posted on
10/07/2003 5:38:28 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: jimmccleod
Limbaugh boosted cigar sales in the '90s...will everyone go out and try oxy now?
Just kidding. This stuff is also available from Paki and SA over the 'net, thanks to AARP.
3 posted on
10/07/2003 5:40:43 AM PDT by
steve8714
To: jimmccleod
Are they trying to prepare us for some bad news?
5 posted on
10/07/2003 5:42:43 AM PDT by
Consort
To: jimmccleod
Rush was out an awful lot at the end of 2000 and beginning of 2001.
I hope for the best for him, because drug addiction is hard to beat, and a fight he will have to fight the rest of his days.
A wife of a friend of mine got hooked on Lortab, and it is not a pretty picture.
9 posted on
10/07/2003 5:46:49 AM PDT by
Guillermo
( Proud Infidel)
To: jimmccleod
From the GOP USA of all places. Despite that it seems to be a fair assessment the situation.
And law enforcement authorities are in possession of a couple of tapes, and a bunch of emails, that substantiate the claims made by Wilma Cline and her husband regarding Limbaugh.
That pretty much seals it. Now hopefully Rush can get on with his revival.
10 posted on
10/07/2003 5:46:53 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: jimmccleod
bookmark
To: jimmccleod
"We conservatives are all saddened by the news that
Rush Limbaugh is being investigated by law enforcement authorities for illegal buys of prescription painkillers."Here's a so-called "conservative" that doesn't seem to believe in the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" that our legal system is founded on. I would like to know how to contact this moron, so that I can give him hell when this all shakes out and Rush is proven innocent!
To: jimmccleod
Unfortunately, it seems that Rush is being prepared to be thrown out of the conservative "lifeboat". Perhaps some people know that more serious details will eventually leak out. Even 6-7 years ago, during the height of Klintons power, I was always afraid, like in a bad dream, that something from Rush's private life would pop up to destroy his credibility. But I always said to myself: "No, Rush is too smart and important to self-destruct". He might survive this crisis if no new developments become public, but it seems most liberals and even some conservatives are already dancing on the grave of his political credibility.
14 posted on
10/07/2003 5:49:07 AM PDT by
Lockbar
To: jimmccleod
I will withhold judgement of Rush until I hear his side. The demoncrats are out for blood. His biggest mistake will probably turn out to be hiring housekeeper Wilma Cline.
To: All
Given Limbaugh's outstanding analytical mind and sharp wit, it's difficult to believe that he's constantly in a drug induced state. I agree. It will be interesting to see how this pans out.
To: jimmccleod
Rush's private life is his own affair. What I want from Rush is his insight into the political arena that I can't get from the liberal media. As long as he can provide that insight I'm behind him no matter what he does in private.
23 posted on
10/07/2003 5:55:37 AM PDT by
Noachian
(Liberalism belongs to the Fool, the Fraud, and the Vacuous)
To: jimmccleod
Sonething about this whole thing still doesn't pass the smell test. I'll trust Rush for now, at least until the body of evidence extends beyond the Enquirer.
To: jimmccleod
I am not ready not believe this but if it does turn out to be true, I am wishing Rush an easy rehab. Not to worry Rush, I still love you! Your freeper fan, Ditter
29 posted on
10/07/2003 5:59:42 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: jimmccleod
Alcoholism is supposed to be about 10%, a conveniently round number, of the population.
I would guess that drug addiction among the wealthy is probably about the same.
The lower class wino drinks Mogen David 20/20 and sleeps under a bridge.
The middle class alcoholic drinks good stuff and pulls himself together to go to work every day.
The junkie can't function in society and sinks rapidly into disease and poisoning from the adulterants in street drugs.
The rich can buy clean paraphenalia and pure enough drugs to keep functioning for many years, or forever.
So9
To: jimmccleod
"As to The National Enquirer article, I read it. And I found it to be credible..."
I have yet to hear how someone can take, on average, 66 oxycodone pills per day for over a year. I talked to a pharmacist. He said there was NO WAY that he could even function, if he managed to survive that many drugs.
Sorry, but I don't find that very credible.
31 posted on
10/07/2003 6:01:13 AM PDT by
Bryan24
To: jimmccleod
They keep talking like his drug abuse (if true) is current, but it's said that the Enquirer sat on the story for two years. Is he NOW using drugs? That hasn't been clarified in the reports and rumors I've heard.
32 posted on
10/07/2003 6:01:23 AM PDT by
Moonmad27
("I will send a message to the political class..it's no longer business as usual." - Arnold S.)
To: Fred Mertz
Limbaugh news.
To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...
35 posted on
10/07/2003 6:02:39 AM PDT by
Born Conservative
("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
To: jimmccleod
Another clue in his substance abuse is the fact that he was always at least 350 pounds and now he is slim, trim. The drugs he is accused of taking cause loss of appetite and weight loss.
38 posted on
10/07/2003 6:05:35 AM PDT by
sonserae
To: jimmccleod
You know, for a guy that made his living by talking ON THE RADIO for the past 10-15 years, it would seem that he at one time has spoken almost every word in the English language.
With modern technology, Im a little leery of putting a lot of stock in a RECORDING.
</tinfoil hat>
40 posted on
10/07/2003 6:07:18 AM PDT by
Robe
(Rome did not create a great empire with meetings, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson