Posted on 10/07/2003 5:37:58 AM PDT by jimmccleod
Limbaugh's Secret Life By Carol Devine-Molin October 6, 2003
We conservatives are all saddened by the news that Rush Limbaugh is being investigated by law enforcement authorities for illegal buys of prescription painkillers. If accounts being bandied about the media are accurate, then Limbaugh: a) has procured tremendous amounts of highly addictive narcotic medications from his pill-pushing housekeeper Wilma Cline, and, b) is likely to be subjected to arrest. Oh, by the way, dear Wilma sold her hot celebrity story to The National Enquirer for about four hundred thousand dollars. Am I surprised by the overall situation? Yes and no.
Given Limbaugh's outstanding analytical mind and sharp wit, it's difficult to believe that he's constantly in a drug induced state. Who is more articulate and funny than Limbaugh in the world of political commentary? Nobody. However, the hard truth is this: Among entertainers, media personalities and politicos, substance abuse exists in epidemic proportions. For that reason, many conservatives have quickly moved beyond denial and are prepared to hear the worst of it. And I think the majority of conservatives will continue to be compassionate and supportive toward El Rushbo as long as he embraces rehabilitative efforts.
Limbaugh is clearly the most influential conservative of our era, with a radio audience of up to thirty million listeners each week. He's probably converted more Americans to the conservative persuasion than any individual except Ronald Reagan. Understandably, Limbaugh's myriad political foes rejoice in his current troubles. Al Franken and the radical Left are ecstatic. If the tabloid piece largely pans out, Limbaugh has provided his enemies with significant ammunition in efforts to discredit and silence him. But will those hostile to Limbaugh ultimately succeed in ruining him? I doubt it. His current woes are definitely a setback, but not insurmountable. I would state one pivotal caveat. The only individual who can really bring down Limbaugh is Limbaugh himself. Conservatives will maintain solidarity with Limbaugh if, and only if, he dedicates himself to being clean and sober. However, if Limbaugh continues to dabble in drugs, his legion of fans and listeners will slowly drift away.
Although most people are focused upon Limbaugh's legal circumstances, much more is at stake. Drug addiction is a life-threatening condition, which requires proper intervention. Reports indicate that Limbaugh had been rapidly detoxed twice, but returned to drugs both times. Of course he has to undergo another detoxification, and not of the dubious "ultra-rapid" variety that is completed in 24 hours. But what about follow-up care? I'm referring to a program of drug treatment to prevent relapse. Importantly, with relapse there's always the specter of overdose and further physical deterioration. And Limbaugh will have to fight his addictive inclinations for the rest of his life - that is the nature of the beast. It's encouraging to note that many radio and television personalities, such as Don Imus and Larry Kudlow, are succeeding in their day-by-day recovery efforts.
The drugs taken by Limbaugh - OxyContin, Lorcet and Hydrocone - are terribly dangerous by all accounts. Never mind that they cause a host of emotional side effects including paranoia and mood swings. Now, it's coming to light that at least two of these powerful painkillers are linked to sudden hearing loss. In other words, it's conceivable that Limbaugh's deafness was caused by his own addictive behaviors. If that turns out to be the case, it's not only tragic but speaks to the incredible grip of dependency created by these drugs. On some level Rush Limbaugh, like all substance abusers, has self-destructive tendencies. That's his private business, and his responsibility to explore through counseling. For addicts, arrest is often a good thing since the Court system forces them into essential treatment. Roy Black is a very adept criminal attorney who understands these issues. If Limbaugh is charged with a crime, certainly mandatory drug rehabilitation would be part of the plea bargain. I doubt that Limbaugh would be made to serve any jail time.
As to The National Enquirer article, I read it. And I found it to be credible, rife with details that demonstrate the severity of Limbaugh's substance abuse problem. Limbaugh had at least one other drug supplier besides Wilma Cline, referred to as his "FedEx" connection. Apparently OxyContin is Limbaugh's drug of choice. And law enforcement authorities are in possession of a couple of tapes, and a bunch of emails, that substantiate the claims made by Wilma Cline and her husband regarding Limbaugh. The Cline couple cut themselves a very nice deal with the people at The National Enquirer that are experts at marketing
For the record: Destructor is superior to most!
How much more entertaining would a broadcaster be in a blissful dream state than in the normal state of a 52 year old with all the associated aches and pains. I hope and pray he makes it, but the creative manic state may be hard to achieve naturally.
If anyone can do it Rush can, though it is not the end of the world if he does not return to daily broadcasting. He already has made quite an impact and in the unfortunate chance that he retires, others will come.
Big lie. Show me where I said anything of the sort.
Then you proceed to rave about "the Enquirer" as a great source for news
Another even bigger lie. Again, show me where I said anything of the sort. You can't, because not only have I not said the Enquirer is a "great source for news", I've not said much about the merits or veracity of the Enquirer at all. Nothing more than what we all already know.
You, sir, are completely mental, and a pathological liar. If you're saying this for the simple folly of it all, fine, have a laugh. But if you really believe what you're saying, you really, honestly need to get some help from mental health professionals. You've yet to say a single honest thing to, or about, me.
I haven't watched Andy in double digit years. To me he always sounds like he's whining. I wouldn't miss this one though.
LOL! In other words you know you're dead wrong but you're not about to admit it.
As I've told you already, I'm no fan of the source, but I'm not going to be as obtuse as you and deny that they got the crux of the story correct, as conveyed by Rush himself. Are you still in denial about that?
You're sudden state of panic and denial is really pathetic.
What panic? What denial? You really need to look in a mirror. You're the one who's making wild, baseless accusations, heated denials, backpeddling, and bellicose assertions that have no semblance of truth. But you say I'm the one in panic and denial.
LOL. That's too funny.
You took the initial "news" story that was published by "the Enquirer," and openly condemned Rush Limbaugh on all counts! Deny that!!
Show me where I did any such thing. Cut and paste the quote, or give me a post number. Come on, let's see it. Where did I "openly condemn" Rush??? Huh?
Again, you can't show any such thing because you're lying. Why would anyone have any reason to listen to a word you say?
I've enjoyed messin' with your mind, but now you're beginning to bore the hell out of me! Have a great weekend!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.