Skip to comments.
Officials Warn of Absentee Vote Factor in Recall Election
New York Times ^
| 10-7-03
| SARAH KERSHAW
Posted on 10/06/2003 8:39:58 PM PDT by deport
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: John Lenin
Absentee ballots still use the old punch card system, how long does it take for a machine to count punch cards ? Answer, a few seconds at most per thousand.
Actually, the most time intensive thing is verifying the signatures on the ballots vs the voter registration and absentee ballot request. That is what will take the most time.
21
posted on
10/06/2003 9:16:48 PM PDT
by
kingu
(100 percent of liberals would like to see Free Republic fail.)
To: deport
See this thread regarding how I was disenfranchised due to not getting my absentee ballot! Bummer dude!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/996301/posts
22
posted on
10/06/2003 9:17:23 PM PDT
by
Drango
(In splitting the Republican vote, McClintock is the new SoreLoserman.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Well, ya see - on "regular" elections, they can count ALL of them overnight .....
Absentee ballots delivered on the day of the election or the day before have traditionally taken time to count. This is nothing surprising, other than the huge number of the ballots. If their numbers are right, the remaining absentee ballots will equal what the entire absentee returns were a few years ago. Pretty amazing...
23
posted on
10/06/2003 9:19:13 PM PDT
by
kingu
(100 percent of liberals would like to see Free Republic fail.)
To: deport
Voter faud: 12%
Delay in courts: 5 month.
24
posted on
10/06/2003 9:21:56 PM PDT
by
Hunble
To: deport
"But 800,000 additional absentee ballots and an expected 400,000 ballots that will not be counted until after election night"Ah yes. Just enough dead people and illegal immigrants to insure that Davis stays in power. I'm sure a few of them will have McClintock votes in them just to feign legitimacy. But all the Arnold votes should have been weeded out by then.
25
posted on
10/06/2003 9:22:15 PM PDT
by
Tempest
(9th inning of a winning game and you guys are still whining to trade pitchers?!)
To: Tempest
Anyone know what time the polls open and close in California tomorrow?
26
posted on
10/06/2003 9:22:51 PM PDT
by
zencat
To: Drango
Absentee balloting is a headache to keep straight.... It seems an early voting arrangement would make things easier and eliminate a ton of the mail ballots...
27
posted on
10/06/2003 9:23:01 PM PDT
by
deport
To: zencat
7 a.m. till 8 p.m.
28
posted on
10/06/2003 9:24:24 PM PDT
by
deport
To: martin_fierro
Agreed...The election PART II (sigh).
29
posted on
10/06/2003 9:24:32 PM PDT
by
lainde
To: zencat
7 am open I'm not sure of the close time. I suspect it'll be extended so that all the dead Democrats and illegal aliens will have time to vote.
30
posted on
10/06/2003 9:24:53 PM PDT
by
Tempest
(9th inning of a winning game and you guys are still whining to trade pitchers?!)
To: deport
I'm from Chicago, and believe me, I know what vote fraud smells like.. and this has the stink of a cover story all over it.
First the phony polls showing the recall is drawing closer, then media reports warning the computers are corruptible, and dangerously unreliable, and now this.. Remember the Prince of Darkness is personally in charge (Clinton took command about a month ago)
31
posted on
10/06/2003 9:33:11 PM PDT
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: deport
Davis' people can change a lot those absentee votes while the weeks drag on.
32
posted on
10/06/2003 9:35:19 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(www.geocities.com/geronl, stop the DAZI Party)
To: deport
There are a lot of absentee votes. The Democrats' big problem is they didn't slime early enough to affect the outcome. Those votes can't be changed. In a sense one is practically grateful for their stupidity.
33
posted on
10/06/2003 9:37:43 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kingu
But running the cards through the macines will only take a day at most, if the election isn't even close I would think that verifying signatures would be a total waste of time and money.
34
posted on
10/06/2003 9:42:31 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(Remember, we're fighting for this woman's honor, which is probably far more than she's ever done)
To: deport
California!
35
posted on
10/06/2003 9:43:10 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Saundra Duffy
Has CA every proposed some type early voting process as opposed to absentee voting? Do you know... It sure seems it would streamline the process over what they are doing now.... Just curious
36
posted on
10/06/2003 9:51:39 PM PDT
by
deport
To: deport
San Diego will use punch cards. Fast counting.
37
posted on
10/06/2003 9:54:44 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Ask the Indian$)
To: carlo3b
FreeRepublic should add a pool to the donation drive. Take bids for the number of lawsuits that will be filed, the number of days that the election results will be delayed/challenged, and the top prize for when the whole mess appears before the US Supremes (and whether the vote will be 5-4 or 6-3 to slap the 9th Circuit Court with a big wet fish).
38
posted on
10/06/2003 9:57:28 PM PDT
by
Ophiucus
To: Ophiucus
FreeRepublic should add a pool to the donation drive. Take bids for the number of lawsuits that will be filed, the number of days that the election results will be delayed/challenged, and the top prize for when the whole mess appears before the US Supremes (and whether the vote will be 5-4 or 6-3 to slap the 9th Circuit Court with a big wet fish). Yeah!!!... This election is turning into a bookmaker's wet dream.. :o)
39
posted on
10/06/2003 10:02:30 PM PDT
by
carlo3b
(http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
To: deport
This year, our precinct was transitioned to a vote by mail precinct. (I live in a sparsely populated area.) We had to fill in the oval with black ink. Then we sign and put our address on the envelope.
When I hand delivered my vote to the County Clerk (one of the options,) I commented, so much for annonymnity with my name right there. She said they open the envelope without the name showing. Then they feed it into a reader that tallies it.
I imagine they verify signatures off the envelope.
40
posted on
10/06/2003 10:20:44 PM PDT
by
marsh2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson