Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: visualops
The press ethic that he applied to McNabb (wrongly in my opinion), was certainly operative in the Sorenstam story several months ago. It's been years since my work schedule allowed me to listen to his show at all, so I didn't hear what he had to say about that golf event, but a politically correct press pack mentality, favoring a liberal point of view, probably was the windmill at which he was tilting-- unfortuneatly, the windmill unhorsed him. I suspect he would have relished a counter argument by his ESPN colleagues, which would have allowed him to flesh out his thesis, and soften the racial flavor of his comments.
97 posted on 10/06/2003 7:28:25 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: gusopol3
he would have relished a counter argument...which would have allowed him to flesh out his thesis

No doubt. Would have been a good argument. Shame there's such a lack of discourse. The PC crap really kills it. But, that's part of the plan since they don't teach critical thinking in public school anymore.
101 posted on 10/06/2003 7:34:37 PM PDT by visualops (Two Wrongs don't make a right... They make the Democratic Ticket for 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson