I said if there is a biological component. That isn't up for interpretation. It is a matter of objective reality. Either the component exists or it doesn't. If the person doesn't have it they're truly deviant. If it does then they are to be pitied because their deviant behavior is built into their DNA.
The idea that wherever sex organs can fit and a person enjoys having them, ultimately defines what is "natural for them" is the warped.
I said that if a genetic defect causes them to have that orientation then it is nature, not nurture, that makes them that way. It is thus natural for them to be that way. I don't see why that is so hard to grasp. They didn't choose to be that way.
What about all the homosexuals (and there are many) who admit - often proudly - that they DID choose their orientation?
What about the MANY ex-homosexuals who have chosen NOT to be that way any more?
Come on, your arguments are very weak.