To: BibChr
However, in an interview today with talk-radio host Sean Hannity, Stewart claimed L.A. Times reporters have told her the paper held the story, despite warnings from lawyers it would hurt the L.A. Times more than it hurts Schwarzenegger. Does anyone remember when a paper just reported?
Now, it seems, their jollies come when stories get distorted.
Ah, the good old days when newsmen shone in all their glory...
Now reporters gloat and whine when they become the story ;o(
Payback Time Tomorrow!
Davis OUT, Arnold IN.
Slimey tactics MUST NOT WIN!!!
20 posted on
10/06/2003 2:56:58 PM PDT by
b9
To: doodlelady
Amen.
23 posted on
10/06/2003 3:02:18 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: doodlelady
Good one!
24 posted on
10/06/2003 3:02:23 PM PDT by
onyx
(Ask the Indian$)
To: doodlelady
it is notable that, for all the anti-drudge opinions posted on FR, if all the media were as willing to post negative material on ANY political figure as he is, this sort of circumstance would be much less common.
While it is probably better for 2nd amendment issues to have bushW in office rather than any given DEM, much less HRC, in many policy areas they are virtually identical. If patriot act had been offered on clinton's watch, the outcry would have been far greater on FR. In the event, many posters take a pro-patriot act attitude which I cannot imagine them presenting if HRC were the president in office at the time. Obviously she may inherit the powers of this law when and if she becomes elected, or if not her some other domestic-root-causes oriented politician in the future.
Have you called a customer support line recently? Which country was your call sent to? Is this part of bush's job creation policy this is a hemorraging of jobs from the US that will never come back, and neither the gop or dnc is making any noise over it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson