Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Gawain
Like I said, it was oblique - but I still think it's reasonable to draw that conclusion based on what he did say.

If someone said, "Sir Gawain sat down and tried to figure out how much evil he could get away with," and "The bullet you hear is not the one that kills you," referring to you, would you consider them neutral remarks?
328 posted on 10/06/2003 10:26:28 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (I'm not perfect, but parts of me are excellent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Like I said, it was oblique - but I still think it's reasonable to draw that conclusion based on what he did say.

Then the reply should be "I believe Keyes thinks Bush is evil, based on this statement:" instead of "Keyes called Bush evil" (which never happened).

If someone said, "Sir Gawain sat down and tried to figure out how much evil he could get away with," and "The bullet you hear is not the one that kills you," referring to you, would you consider them neutral remarks?

I don't think I would care one way or the other, but I must confess it would be cool having legions of fans willing to fight to the death to defend me on a website.

337 posted on 10/06/2003 10:32:05 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson