Apparently Doug is someone who is able to see a difference between the boorish behavior of a group compared to a vicious biting rape and the threatening of a victim's children. If Arnold gropes once as a public official, I want him gone.
Apparently Doug is someone who is able to see a difference between the boorish behavior of a group compared to a vicious biting rape and the threatening of a victim's children. If Arnold gropes once as a public official, I want him gone.
Your post is internally inconsistent. First, you call ARnold's alleged groping merely "boorish behavior" -- but then you say if he did it as an officehold, you'd want him gone. So you admit that it's bad - - (and molesting, which is the more accurate term is more than boorish, it's criminal) - - - but you don't think it's disqualifying for someone who is merely a candidate, only for an officeholder? No,you're right, I'm too dense to understand those distinctions.