Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carton253
But, the platform is voted and agreed on by the majority. it is not a unanimous decision. Should the minority now have to seek another party?

You raise good questions about the platform of the party as it relates to the members. One must wonder what limits, if any, there are to inclusion within the Republican Party. Let's say that Tom Dachle, for instance, wanted to join the GOP. Should he be allowed? If not, what positions of his fail the "litmus test"?

196 posted on 10/06/2003 9:28:04 AM PDT by jmc813 (Arnold needs to drop out now for the good of the party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: jmc813
But Tom Daschle wouldn't want to join the Republican party because he has no agreement at all. Using him extremes the argument. I'm talking about people who agree more than they disagree.

What I have seen on the Tom vs Arnold threads is the simple point that only conservatives can be Republicans. I disagree with that assessment.

204 posted on 10/06/2003 9:32:55 AM PDT by carton253 (All I need to know about Islam I learned on 9/11/2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson