Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaggieMay
Thank you, Maggie!

It sounds like Amber was perhaps getting background information from this Lori Ellsworth, who had obviously known Scott longer. Or perhaps telling Ellsworth some of what Scott said, in order to check to see if he was telling the truth about certain things, things like, maybe, where he was on particular days before Laci's death, etc. Ellsworth might have remembered, perhaps, certain evenings when she knew Scott and Laci were together at home, etc.

I wouldn't be surprised to find this Ellsworth testifying at the trial, and testifying that she sort of worked in concert with Amber, all under the direction of the police.
313 posted on 10/12/2003 7:52:01 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies ]


To: Devil_Anse
This is a quote from two law professors commenting from the above article."More important in a legal sense is how an important witness's credibility might be affected if she shared sensitive information with the victim's family, Jones and Sereno agreed."

Devil Anse,in a past conversations you and I had talked about when Amber began cooperation with LE,she began acting as "an agent of the state".Given this,do you think these conversations will indeed receive intense scrutiny? And if so,what might the outcome be?
314 posted on 10/12/2003 9:20:04 AM PDT by MaggieMay (A blank tag is a terrible thing to waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson