1 posted on
10/05/2003 9:39:48 PM PDT by
Mini-14
To: *bang_list
bang
2 posted on
10/05/2003 9:40:17 PM PDT by
Mini-14
To: All
Donate to Free Republic, and Save Larry The Lobster!!!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/05/2003 9:43:17 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Mini-14
The GOP establishment has denigrated the Second Amendment in this campaign as a mere social issue out of many, instead of what it really isa keystone of a free republic. Its time they learned that for some of usI pray enoughtheir assault on our right to keep and bear arms under force of law is a declaration of war. Indeed it is. .....And the Republcrats will find out the hard way, so it appears.
4 posted on
10/05/2003 9:45:42 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mini-14
On Tuesday, Oct. 7, Ill be voting for Tom McClintock, and Ill do so with a clear conscience. In the fine tradition of Perot and Buchanan supporters. I'm simply amazed that some never grasp the simple concept that half a loaf is better than none. After 8 years of Bill Clinton, even our resident Forrest Gumps should have figured it out by now.
5 posted on
10/05/2003 9:46:15 PM PDT by
Young Rhino
(Do the French know the meaning of the words soap, water, and deodorant?)
To: NRA2BFree
Bang!
6 posted on
10/05/2003 9:47:51 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: Mini-14
If gun owners vote for Schwarzenegger, they will once more validate former Republican Party National Chair Lee Atwaters cynical dismissal, Where else do [they] have to go? Constitution Party bud .... and you better believe that we will.
7 posted on
10/05/2003 9:48:26 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Virtue untested is innocence)
To: Mini-14
Let me get this straight.... Arnold supports the Assault Weapons Ban, and this makes him a bad evil person.
Bush supports the Assault Weapons Ban, and this makes him a thoughtful political person?
And I shouldn't vote for Arnold, but I should vote to re-elect Bush?
Just curious about the lacking logic of this post.
Regardless, CA just sat and said nothing while the sitting Governor banned handguns, so I really doubt that Bush is thinking CA gives a rats butt about the second amendment or lack thereof.
14 posted on
10/05/2003 10:11:36 PM PDT by
LaraCroft
(Ping a ding ding)
To: Mini-14
Reportedly in Viet Nam, the US used some 50,000 rounds of ammo to kill each enemy combatant.
Ruby Ridge, Idaho and At Mt. Carmel, Waco, Texas the efficiency increased because We the People sat by and let a top down sanctioned, unConstitutional JBT training op and clean-up crew run wild over dead innocents including children.
The central government of incumbant rulers continue to have a problem with our Bill of Rights, the 1st and 2nd Amendments in particular since critical clauses of the 4th, 5th, 9th, and 10th have long been corrupted, nullified, or ignored.
We the People have passively allowed usurpation after usurpation by rulers quoting "compelling State interests" officiously huffing "controlling legal authority" backed by armed force and prosedcutorial resources under gaveled doctrines of police powers of the State.
Politicians in and out of blackrobes undermine our ratified Constitution by redefining its words and clauses by proclaiming self-serving doctrines of the "living" Constitution, as cover for their outlaw rogue rule by Executive and Congressional arrogance and daring Judicial fiat.
The only lawful claim to governing authority by those wishing to rule us is under the specific limits of powers pursuant to the Law of the Land, our ratified Constitution. We the People effectively consent to be governed by armed officials only to the point of armed resistance as discussed by Thomas Jefferson and others, in great detail.
Republican, the Party of Lincoln, unConstitutionally invaded sovereign states which voted to leave the Union. The same type of power ueber alles government officials hold office today. Our Bill of Rights threatens them.
Our God-given rights to be armed in self-defense and defense of our ratified Constitution, affrirmed by our 2nd Amendment, extended to all jurisdictions by our RATIFIED Constitution's 14th Amendment, is challenged by those who believe that expanding police powers of the State are more important than the very social contract from which they derive any and all of their lawful authority.
Citizens have the right to keep and bear arms, state of the art arms of our choice. Our ratified Constitution so affirms it. The details of what's allowed by city, county, individual state, or federal laws and regulations are so much officious posturing, threatening We the People, prima facia unConstitutional. Our arms threaten those who threaten us.
Will our State and federal governments muster tens of thousands "police" with as many as 50,000 rounds apiece to threaten millions of armed American citizens with as many as a thousand of rounds apiece? Our Republic depends on who abides our Ratified Constitution, the people or rulers.
We shall take back this debate or face more than civil disobedience as we retire self-governance or those who seek to destroy from within our Constitutional Republic.
We the People will not ask permission.
In this time of Terror War, American armed citizens' valor will protect our Constitutional Republic and our children's chilren's free future.
48 posted on
10/06/2003 2:38:40 AM PDT by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: Mini-14
It's looks like Arnold is going to win, but nothing will change in California except for the fact that there will be a new sheriff in town to pass out the goodies. I suspect that this is the main reason many of the party elites are supporting him. They want a piece of the action.
Arnold is not going to do anything about the 3 issues causing Kalifornia to fail. These 3 issues are: a massive invasion of illegals from the south, a redistributionist state government coupled with massive state spending, and an assault on the Rights of Free men and women by the state government.
The 4th big issue is a hostile business environment, and Arnold is promising a small tax cut which amounts to little more than a drop in the bucket. This isn't going to change the fact that CA will still be hostile to business, let alone revive the state.
The end result will the continuing influx of illegals and outflow of productive Americans. California will likely go bankrupt. And since there is will be a "Republican" running the state, guess who will take the blame? Also, since there is a "Republican" in the WH, guess who's tax dollars will be spent to bail out California? Conservatives get to take it in the shorts, not once, but twice.
But it won't matter to the GOP elites and party bosses in California. They will have already gotten their plunder and will be laughing their way to the bank. And if things really get rough for them, they can always change to the demoncrat party. After all, they believe the same things the demoncrats do.
52 posted on
10/06/2003 6:22:46 AM PDT by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: Mini-14
David Codrea bump!
74 posted on
10/06/2003 12:06:52 PM PDT by
StoneColdGOP
(McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
To: Mini-14
The fact is, if you dont vote for Tom McClintock, you will be telling all politicians who support usand they are few and far betweenthat their faithfulness didnt count, and that you will turn your back on them whenever someone bluffs you into thinking it is the pragmatic thing to do.This has to be THEE best article I've read since ISSA decided "RED" Davis and his Dumbocratic Legislature needed to be held accountable for their intentional overspending!
80 posted on
10/06/2003 1:26:32 PM PDT by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
To: Mini-14
"...former Republican Party National Chair Lee Atwaters cynical dismissal, Where else do [they] have to go?How about, "home," Lee? Wherever the Hell you are?
What will they say when we simply stay home?
85 posted on
10/07/2003 6:59:06 AM PDT by
Redbob
(P14, cocked & locked)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson