Skip to comments.
California gun owners, George Bush is watching you
Keep and Bear Arms ^
| October 6, 2003
| David Codrea
Posted on 10/05/2003 9:39:47 PM PDT by Mini-14
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
To: tpaine
Sure. State government and state laws are an essential front in the war to defend the RKBA, the ignorance and dishonesty of Arnold groupies notwithstanding.
61
posted on
10/06/2003 11:00:13 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
There are over 100 candadates on the roster, I'm sure there are at least a few. You miss the point, which is the future after arnold when the bar has been set low enough for a Democrate to run as a Republican. Example in CA, no. Examples in other states that should make you think: Micheal Bloomberg, Lincoln Chaffee, Olympia Snowe, and before last year Jim Jeffords.
62
posted on
10/06/2003 11:14:17 AM PDT
by
Bommer
To: Bommer
There are over 100 candadates on the roster, I'm sure there are at least a few.Name even one. Take your time.
Examples in other states that should make you think: Micheal Bloomberg, Lincoln Chaffee, Olympia Snowe, and before last year Jim Jeffords.
Arnold's soulmates.
63
posted on
10/06/2003 11:20:42 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: absalom01; yall
The state legislature, for the past two years, has passed a bill through both houses to ban .50 BMG rifles. Tom will veto this, Arnold will sign it.
The state legislature, for the past two years, has passed legilsation to apply a tax ( 10 cents) on each round of ammunition sold in the state. Next year, Arnold will sign it, while Tom would veto.
-a01-
"Tom will veto" nothing. He's unelectable.
And.. -- You have no real evidence Arnie would sign either bill..
-- Arnies a rino, -- & like all of them he has taken positions which help his popularity.
Once elected, he may surprise us all as a one term reformer on individual liberties. If he doesn't, -- what have we lost?
64
posted on
10/06/2003 11:30:54 AM PDT
by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator)
To: Roscoe
Does this mean you have come to your senses & now deny that CA has the power to prohibit assault weapons?
65
posted on
10/06/2003 11:34:55 AM PDT
by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator)
To: Roscoe
Name even one. Take your time Heather Peters, California Gov. Candidate running as a Republican, but says she's a Centrist. Isn't that what Democrats now call themselves? Theres your 1!
66
posted on
10/06/2003 11:37:17 AM PDT
by
Bommer
To: Mr. Mojo
Thanks for the bang! :)
67
posted on
10/06/2003 11:38:55 AM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(Politicians and criminals want your guns for the same reason! They want control while robbing you!)
To: Bommer
Heather Peters What positions does she allegedly take to the left of Arnold?
68
posted on
10/06/2003 11:43:26 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: tpaine
If elected, Arnold will have the power to do considerable damage to our RTKB, while you squeal in delight.
69
posted on
10/06/2003 11:45:04 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Mr. Mojo
70
posted on
10/06/2003 11:47:48 AM PDT
by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy.)
To: Mini-14
The GOP establishment has denigrated the Second Amendment in this campaign as a mere "social issue" out of many, instead of what it really isa keystone of a free republic. It's time they learned that for some of usI pray enoughtheir assault on our right to keep and bear arms under force of law is a declaration of war.What scares me is that the gun owners in CA haven't come unglued and raised enough hell to be heard all the way to DC. If the government can sail through this like a walk in the park, they will be doing it all over the country. It has to stop now!
71
posted on
10/06/2003 11:53:30 AM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(Politicians and criminals want your guns for the same reason! They want control while robbing you!)
To: Roscoe
You know what Roscoe, you win! Your (R)ight! I went to her site and she is more to the right of Arnold, but says she's a Centrist. Thats more telling of your Clinton..I mean Arnold worship. Happy gropeing...uh I mean voting! Wonder if he ever told women to put ice on it. Doesn't matter, Arnold is THE NEW IMPROVED REPUBLICAN PARTY!!!! All the charateristics of Clinton with a (R) by his name and brings a Kennedy with him! Happy voting. Don't forget to flush when your done! hee hee hee!
72
posted on
10/06/2003 11:54:02 AM PDT
by
Bommer
To: yall; Roscoe
Trying to reason with roscoe is like teaching a pig to sing.
Dream on bout 'squealing', roscoe me boyo..
And answer the question:
Does this mean you have come to your senses & now deny that CA has the power to prohibit assault weapons?
73
posted on
10/06/2003 12:04:21 PM PDT
by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator)
To: Mini-14
David Codrea bump!
74
posted on
10/06/2003 12:06:52 PM PDT
by
StoneColdGOP
(McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
To: tpaine
California could repeal the law, but Arnold and his groupies wouldn't like that.
75
posted on
10/06/2003 12:07:13 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Mr. Mojo
Indeed it is. .....And the Republcrats will find out the hard way, so it appears.Yep. That's what it looks like to me too. It's hard to tell them apart these days. Our friends are few and our enemies are many.
76
posted on
10/06/2003 12:16:55 PM PDT
by
NRA2BFree
(Politicians and criminals want your guns for the same reason! They want control while robbing you!)
To: Roscoe
Dream on bout 'squealing', roscoe me boyo..
And answer the question:
Does this mean you have come to your senses & now deny that CA has the power to prohibit assault weapons?
73
Roscoe wrote:
"California could repeal the law, -- "
Which means that you do NOT deny that CA has the power to prohibit assault weapons..
Thank You, roscoe. -- 'Outed' again.
77
posted on
10/06/2003 12:18:03 PM PDT
by
tpaine
( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator)
To: tpaine
The law was passed years ago. Arnold wants the restrictions to be preserved and even extended, while his groupies squeal their support.
78
posted on
10/06/2003 12:21:32 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
The law was passed years ago. Arnold wants the restrictions to be preserved and even extended, while his groupies squeal their support. The federal law (1994 Assault Weapons ban) is what Schwarzenegger was most likely referring to. As governor, he has zero ability to influence this, despite the strained logic of the article at the top of this thread. The fact that we're kicking the topic around in this forum shows that pro-gun voters are *not* asleep.
California's state law re: registering or banning assault weapons (Roberti-Roos, signed into law by a *Republican*, IIRC) is already pretty darned all-encompassing. They've pushed about as far as they can go, short of confiscating all semi-automatics.
Based on Roberti-Roos, the "SKS Sporter" buy-back program was the first step down the road to confiscation. The state was paying $200.00+ for each detachable-magazine SKS rifle turned in. Do any of you CA FReepers have the budget numbers and percentage of compliance info on that particular project? Expanding such a program to all currently-registered semi-autos sounds less than viable, financial speaking.
79
posted on
10/06/2003 12:51:16 PM PDT
by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: Mini-14
The fact is, if you dont vote for Tom McClintock, you will be telling all politicians who support usand they are few and far betweenthat their faithfulness didnt count, and that you will turn your back on them whenever someone bluffs you into thinking it is the pragmatic thing to do.This has to be THEE best article I've read since ISSA decided "RED" Davis and his Dumbocratic Legislature needed to be held accountable for their intentional overspending!
80
posted on
10/06/2003 1:26:32 PM PDT
by
Pagey
(Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson