[aristeides]

There's a presumption in federal tax law that evidence that it is in the power of a party to furnish, and that he does not furnish, is not in his favor. (The leading case is Wichita Terminal.) I wonder if destroying evidence here would create a similar presumption.

[elbucko]

The leading case is Wichita Terminal.) I wonder if destroying evidence here would create a similar presumption.

Good point. However it didn't seem to stop the Clintons. I doubt if it will stop Davis with Lockyear as CA-AG. The IRS, for all the pretense of neutrality, is beholden more to the Democratic Party. It helps to have friends in high places.

The post election flurry of legal motions will be a sight to behold and provide plenty of time and cover to eliminate evidence. The next governor will be lucky to spend Christmas in Sacramento.