Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Critics are wrong, Iraq is moving forward
NY Daily News ^ | October 05 2003 | Charles Krauthammer

Posted on 10/05/2003 7:16:32 AM PDT by knighthawk

On the reconstruction of Iraq, everybody is a genius. Every pundit, every ex-official and, of course, every Democrat knows exactly how it should have been done. Everybody would have had Iraq up and running by now. Everybody, that is, except the Bush administration, which, in its arrogance and stupidity, has so botched the occupation that it is "in danger of losing the peace" — so sayeth Sen. John Kerry, echoing ex-Gov. Howard Dean, Sen. Ted Kennedy and many others down the Democratic food chain. A bit of perspective, gentlemen. What we came upon in Iraq was a country that had just emerged from terror and totalitarianism — largely physically intact (as a result of an unprecedented precision military campaign) but decaying because of neglect and abuse by the gangsters who had run it for more than 30 years.

It was as if, when the Soviet Union imploded in 1991, we had somehow found ourselves in Moscow in charge of the place. The critics are complaining that we are six months into Iraq's reconstruction and it has not been reconstructed. The Russians are 12 years into their reconstruction and they are not even close to success.

Yes, the administration has made mistakes, indeed two very large ones. But it pays to understand how and why they were made.

Error No. 1 was the appointment of Jay Garner to run the reconstruction. The reason he was chosen was his success in rescuing the Kurds after the calamity of their failed 1991 anti-Saddam uprising. Figuring that the war would be bloody, difficult and destructive, we expected a similar humanitarian crisis — hunger, epidemics and refugees. These were reasonable assumptions. The problem was that none of these crises materialized. There was no lack of food, no health disaster and, amazingly, there were no refugees (a tribute to the Iraqis' trust in America's intentions and humanity).

Garner was the right guy in the wrong place. There were other jobs to do, and Garner could not do them well. This error cost us a month, a crucial month.

His successor, Paul Bremer, has done remarkably well. He has had to rule on privatization, the nature of the currency, the establishment of a central bank, the structure of the oil industry. Daily, he has had to make political, infrastructure, security, religious and ethnic decisions that will profoundly affect Iraq's future. The reemergence of life and structure in a country that six months ago had no civil society at all is testimony to his success.

His major mistake was disbanding the army. At the time, it seemed the right thing to do. Keeping Saddam Hussein's army risked the worst possible outcome: a future return to power of a Baathist force. Had we retained the old army, we might have had ready-made military units suitable at least for guarding stationary targets such as oil pipelines, thus relieving coalition troops to go after the enemy. Moreover, dissolution of the Baathist army released a large population of unemployed, disgruntled and weapons-trained young men. Some undoubtedly are shooting at our troops. We have now backtracked a bit, pursuing a less radical de-Baathification for the new Iraqi Army.

These mistakes were serious, but have they cost us the peace? The media cover the sabotage of the oil pipelines. This is perfectly reasonable. It is news and it produces dramatic pictures. But the undramatic story is that Iraq is producing more than 1.6 million barrels a day, more than three-quarters of 2002 production levels. Last week, OPEC unexpectedly cut its production quotas — boosting oil prices and rattling world markets. Why? Because it sees Iraqi oil production coming on line and seriously threatening world prices. Pictures show the sabotage story; OPEC already has acted on the production story.

Losing the peace? That question will be answered only at the endpoint. If in a year or two we are able to leave behind a stable, friendly government, we will have succeeded.

If not, we will have failed. And all the geniuses will be vindicated.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charleskrauthammer; goodnews; iraq; progress; reconstruction; success

1 posted on 10/05/2003 7:16:32 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 10/05/2003 7:17:01 AM PDT by knighthawk (And for the name of peace, we will prevail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
On the reconstruction of Iraq, everybody is a genius.

As always.

3 posted on 10/05/2003 7:19:34 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

 

Keep Our Republic Free

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER
and say THANKS to Jim Robinson!
IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR
THANKS!


4 posted on 10/05/2003 7:20:53 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The Democrats and their spokespersons in their Propaganda Machine (a.k.a. The Mainstream Press) will do anything to discredit President Bush. Presenting the situation in Iraq as some failure of the Bush Administration--presenting it in the worst, most anti-American light possible--is nothing compared to what they are willing to do.

No one can expect anything better of these people. No one can expect truth or accuracy from them.

And anyone who is deceived by them and their motives is a fool.

5 posted on 10/05/2003 8:08:02 AM PDT by Savage Beast (The American Heartland--the Spirit of Flight 93)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Why should we bother to "reconstruct" Iraq? We owe them nothing.

--Boris

6 posted on 10/05/2003 1:16:52 PM PDT by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson