So, you're not bothered at all that there are now 15 women who have made complaints of sexual harassment, nor that the candidate himself made a blanket admission that the accusations are true? Are you a Muslim, or do you simply have no respect for women? Believe in the right of the nobleman to have his way with any woman in his domain, do you?
When you get a chance to catch your breath from all the denials, take a moment to check what these women have actually said, and what Arnold has said in response.
Can YOU refrain from posting personal insults/attacks, implications, and putting words in others' mouths, and talk about what I posted ?
I AM a woman. I am NOT a Muslim and a Muslim, would be offended if any none familial male even looked upon his wife's/daughters'/mother's/other female relative's ankle, let alone " groped " her. That Muslim crack only proves how little you understand about Muslims.
How many women came forward, IN PUBLIC, to accuse Clinton and did not hide behind annonimity ?
How many apologies did Clinton make in public ?
How do you know that the Arnold accusers are telling the truth ? And no, his apologu wasn't specific enough for that to be " proof " that all of these unnamed women are telling the truth.
Did you believe the spewings about President Bush taking a girl to Mexico for an abortion ? Did those printed accusations stop when a girl came forward, saying that this did not happen and that she NEVER even had sexual relations with him ? No, they didn't.
Do I approve of/ just ignore sexual harassment ? No, I don't. OTOH, actors and actresses, from the beginnings of time, have always had looser morals than the general public; which is why, until only recently they were looked down upon by society.
Do the testimonials, by many women he has been in films with, mean nothing at all to you ? Those women came out in public and in print, to say that he hadn't behaved inappropriately.
Do any of us know what Reagan did in Hollywood, on movie sets ? No, we don't. I am not accusing him of bad behaviors, but simply stating that we don't KNOW what he did. We do know that he impregnented Nancy prior to marrying her. We also know that he was divorced and as such, would have been completely unelectable a scant decade prior to his election of governor, because the public refused to elect divorced men back then.
So, you're not bothered at all that there are now 15 women who have made complaints of sexual harassment, nor that the candidate himself made a blanket admission that the accusations are true?
nope, not at all. they filed no complaints. and he never admitted he had committed sexual assault.
surely even you realize that sexual harassment law is clearly in the mind of the harassee... and arnold would be foolish to deny what someone may have THOUGHT regarding an action that took place as long as 20 years ago.
I have been sexually harassed by more than fifteen women in my life... so what? These are scorned women who wanted some action from a hollywood moviestar, mr universe in fact, and did not get what they wanted, is my bet.
he apologized for his behavior, has acknowleged no criminal act taook and has moved on... NONE of the women have pressed charges have they? nor did they at the time.
This BS is transparently dishonest on the part of the LA times.
Now for the agenda question about YOU: who would you prefer we vote for? Davis? Bustamente? or McCee...