Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fqued
I think that the comment "I don't negotiate with terrorists." is over the top. Not only is it incorrect and inflammatory, it brands Tom as one involved in the politics of personal destruction, and groups him with the LA Times.

Here's the quote in context...

McClintock said he will not drop out of the race despite the fact some believe he is committing political suicide. "I've seen all of the preliminary threats," he said. "'If you don't get out of the race, we'll end your political career.' My response is, I don't negotiate with terrorists."

Over the top? Maybe.

Do I agree with it in sentiment? Absolutely.

The comment wasn't directed at Schwarzenegger, who from all appearances and from McClintock's own comments, has been a gentlman to Tom.

The comment was meant for the backstabbing party hacks who've been trying to bully McClintock out of the race. The hell with them, they're the same "appeasement or nothing" crowd that's been running California Republican Party for years.

These people would rather fight their own than Democrats. Their message to McClintock's constituency has been "shut up and vote" throughout this campaign. That's their idea of "unity."

I might have phrased it differently, but good for Tom for smacking them back.


44 posted on 10/04/2003 1:44:33 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
thank you for your post.

the million-dollar question:
After the election is over, and it appears that Arnold will win, possibly with over 50% of the vote,
HOW do we mend the fences?
HOW do the Freepers who have said harsh and inflammatory things get back on the same track?
HOW does the Cal. GOP re-unite?

the second question:

Since Arnold draws his support from a large segment of the spectrum (conservatives, moderates, and some sort-of liberals [though not the farther left]), does the hard conservative wing of the GOP in Cal have any clout left?
I.e., does Arnold have any need for that 10-15%? and if not, have they [unfortunately] relegated themselves to the outside looking in?

Any thoughts?

This in no way disparages any of those on either side of the Tom-Arnold debate who were within the bounds of propriety. Warm zeal is fine.
55 posted on 10/04/2003 2:05:00 PM PDT by fqued (Arnold, in spite of a "vote for Tom McClintock being a vote for Pia Zadora.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson