This really isn't that hard.
I was advised by the poster ......[ with me? ] ....... that all he needed to believe he is innocent was for Rush to publicly state that he did not do it. .......[ still here? ] ...... I said Clinton stated that he did not have sex with Monica ...... [ we're almost home ] ....... My refernce to that means Just because a person denies an accusation does not mean they are innocent!
Rush has not denied anything and has kept quiet. {AS HE SHOULD HAVE DONE}
I believe Rush will be vindicated, so you know where I am on this.
The point is the posters premise was bogus.
I hope you understand what I am trying to say here.
Follow my beginning post [ #25 I think], and follow them through. It should become clear.
If it isn't I have not layed it out well enough.