Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TheAngryClam
One would think it would be when he was their nominee.

When it became obvious that McWampum cared more for receiving Indian money than actually putting himself or somebody else into a position to win the governor's race, the vast majority of party members simply followed the old dictum about not throwing money or political support down a rathole. That's not backstabbing, that's common sense.

32 posted on 10/04/2003 9:53:26 AM PDT by strela (Will Tom McClintock have to "make a re$ervation" to pay back all that Indian money?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: strela
McWampum cared more for receiving Indian money

1. Most of the Indian money spent on his behalf was done through independent expenditures.

2. Just because Arnold decided he didn't want Indian money, McClintock is under no obligation to do likewise.

3. Are Arnold's contributors any less "special interests?"

The only legitimate issue with regard to the Indian money is Bustamante's Illegal use of it.


33 posted on 10/04/2003 10:05:04 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: strela
Changing the subject now, and throwing in a red herring to boot.

I'm referring to previous statewide runs.

Argue with facts, or admit you're full of it.
34 posted on 10/04/2003 10:10:13 AM PDT by TheAngryClam (A proud member of the McClintock Militia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson