Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett
Schwarzenegger seemed to be the lesser of two evils compared to Bustamante, but that rationale disappears when Bustamante turns out to be the candidate that can't win

But McClintock still has to prove that HE CAN win. So far, he hasn't.

25 posted on 10/03/2003 12:26:58 PM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Earl of Mar
I do not need a candidate to prove that they can win.
The candidate that I need is the one that most closely matches my principles.
For me, thats Tom McClintock, and not Schwarzenegger.

(I voted the same way during the primaries. Simon over Riordan. Funny though, that Simon seems to not have the intestinal fortitude, as shown by his endorsement of Schwarzenegger. Per his last campaign, he shares more with McClintock.)

64 posted on 10/03/2003 12:48:45 PM PDT by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson