To: Pelham
The date of this study appears to be March, 2000. How does that fit with the timing of his hearing loss? I believe he went deaf in 2001 post this study. It obviously is the place to go for him
215 posted on
10/03/2003 9:27:34 PM PDT by
Nov3
(one day at a time)
To: Nov3
You're quite right, this study was done about a year earlier than when he went deaf. But the content of the study sure makes you wonder if he didn't suffer the same fate as the subjects. It surely would be a terrible thing to have inadvertantly destroyed your own hearing.
216 posted on
10/03/2003 9:37:59 PM PDT by
Pelham
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson