Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Talks on Capitol Hill to Regulate Tobacco Industry Break Down
Smoke Club Newsletter ^ | 10-2-03 | By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos.

Posted on 10/03/2003 10:06:10 AM PDT by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last
To: TKDietz
And PS, Mom was a non-smoker.
121 posted on 10/06/2003 12:22:44 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Cuba, China, and Sweden are harshly anti-drug, as was the Soviet Union.

Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?

The New Statesman, which is more typically shrouded in the soft socialist values of George Bernard Shaw or Beatrice Webb than Mill, argued that prohibitionists had not met that burden.

How is that responsive to anything I posted?

Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?

122 posted on 10/06/2003 12:23:13 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
The first sentence of the piece you quoted (without attribution, or even quotation marks): "The right-of center British magazine the Economist has for years
called for an end to the drug war and the legalization of the drug
trade."
123 posted on 10/06/2003 12:25:33 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
I too have more important things to do - it's parent teacher conference day at my daughter's school, but I'm waiting for the dryer to finish so I figure I can hang for a few more minute :-)

I have yet to see a "no shoes, no shirt" sign on a true public building, yet the elected officials are generally the ones that mandate the private sector require those regulations.

Gee, I can walk into the state capitol building barefoot, but I can't go into the convenience store thusly unattired.

Certain rules for certain people. lovely.
124 posted on 10/06/2003 12:28:30 PM PDT by Gabz (Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
From the open publishing newswire: Many Indymedia readers have been raised on the “War on Drugs.” There were too many socialist-type gains in the 60s and 70s for the taste of President Nixon. With the mind-expansion help of drugs, people were uniting, racial and gender lines blurred and rights were won, communes that questioned land ownership were born, people loved freely and a war was stopped.
From a United States perspective, what has this 30-year war given us? A booming profit-driven prison economy where half of those incarcerated are non-violent drug consumers? An expensive law enforcement system where one half of our “peace officers” are mandated to convict petty sellers and consumers? A drained economy that sends billions upon billions of US dollars to right wing paramilitaries in Latin America to stop drug production, which kills thousands of peasants.

This war has fueled a violent black market, a savage capitalism that will never be diminished because of the enormous profits to be had. And, although our government professes concern for the consumer, thousands die each year due to no quality regulation. A friend of mine died last year because of this.

The war has failed, violently and miserably, and its motivation now as in the beginning is clearly right wing government control. First to slap down US leftists and now to control all of Latin America so the literal superhighways may be paved through such devices as Plan Colombia, Plan Puebla Panama and the extension of NAFTA.

125 posted on 10/06/2003 12:33:16 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: TKDietz
I just don't think it's such a bad thing.

Of course you don't, you're a former smoker. You are not a bar or restaurant owner whose business is being decimated. I've got way too many friends in the hospitality industry to not know what this is doing to them. And I have been in this battle far too long to even begin to think the anti-smokers ar doing this for any other reason than money.

But, local communities would still have the right to pass local ordinances that reflect the values of local citizens. That way, there would be a place for everyone in America that suits the tastes, lifestyles and moral codes of the wide variety of individuals who make up this country.

I can 95% agree with you on that. The problem with these smoking ban ordinances is that the highly Paid (smoker-funded) anti organizations come into a town or city or county or state and proclaim how such bans will do wonders for business and health. In other words they lie - but because they have so much money, people that know better, such as business owners from jurisdictions where these things have passed don't have a snowballs chance in Hades to get their voice heard.

The total smoking ban in Delaware has been a boon to business, in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey. The only businesses that have profitted from the ban in Delaware are the fraternal and veteran's organizations, they are exempt and their membership numbers have skyrocketed.

126 posted on 10/06/2003 12:39:22 PM PDT by Gabz (Smoke-gnatzies - small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Cuba, China, and Sweden are harshly anti-drug, as was the Soviet Union.

Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?
127 posted on 10/06/2003 12:39:52 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Most people I know who smoke wish they didn't. I smoked for more than twenty years and like most people I know who smoke, I was always talking about how I really wished I could quit. There are some people, however, who seem to be able to get away with occasional smoking without ever getting to the point where they can't leave them alone. These people appear to be in the minority. Most frequent smokers develop an addiction/dependancy/habit, whatever you want to call it, and it gets to the point that they can't quit without a good deal of difficulty.

I'm just floored to hear that there are still people out there who don't consider cigarettes to be addictive. Haven't you known anyone who has tried and tried to quit smoking but constantly failed? Haven't you known people you felt were credible who told you about their struggles with quitting smoking?

People who smoke like you do are in the minority. Most who smoke a pack every few days either quit or end up smoking more and more and more until they find themselves hooked. These aren't my emotions talking, this is my nearly forty years on this planet's worth of experience talking.

Again, you may be built such that you are not particularly susceptible to nicotine addiction, but most of the rest of out there do not possess your superior genetics. Most of us who smoke with regularity for an extended period of time turn into nicotine fiends. I can't tell you how many times I tried to quit and how much money I spent on nicotine patches, gum and other smoking cessation treatment. If I hadn't have been addicted. I would have just put 'em down and walked away like I did with some other bad habits I had through my college years.

And as for the comment about how the "biggest lie of all" is that tobacco has anything to do with the death rate in this country, all I can say is that there are still those out there who believe the world is flat, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The notion that there is some vast conspiracy to fool everyone into thinking cigarettes are unhealthy when in fact they are not is laughable. Why on earth would this be so? No doubt there is a good deal of pure exaggerated propaganda out there by government and anti-smoking concerns. The same thing goes on in the war on drugs, but there is just way too much smoke for there not to be any fire. There is just too much evidence from too many sources who have found that cigarettes are unhealthy and many of these sources have absolutely nothing to gain from saying cigarettes are bad.

Okay, I've blown way too much time today. I need to get a few things filed and walk across the street to the jail and talk to a few people hopelessly "habituated" to methamphetamine.
128 posted on 10/06/2003 1:05:02 PM PDT by TKDietz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
The study, “Gun Control in the United States: A Comparative Survey of State Firearm Laws,” was conducted jointly by the Open Society Institute’s Center on Crime, Communities and Culture and the Funders’ Collaborative for Gun Violence Prevention.

... But the study stresses that the foundation of effective gun control is registration and licensing, two elements crucial in preventing guns moving from legal to illegal ownership.

The Center on Crime, Communities and Culture, a project of the Open Society Institute, funds projects to achieve public safety solutions through sentencing reform and by reducing both gun violence and excessive incarceration. The Open Society Institute is a nonprofit grantmaking foundation created by George Soros. The Funders’ Collaborative for Gun Violence Prevention consists of OSI, the Irene Diamond Fund and other funders working together to reduce and prevent the harm caused by excessive availibility of guns.

129 posted on 10/06/2003 1:10:01 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
I think you need a lesson in civics and socialism.
130 posted on 10/06/2003 1:11:02 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
The study, “Gun Control in the United States: A Comparative Survey of State Firearm Laws,”

... has nothing to do with tobacco or other drugs. What is your point?

131 posted on 10/06/2003 1:17:20 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Cuba, China, and Sweden are harshly anti-drug, as was the Soviet Union.

Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?

I think you need a lesson in civics and socialism.

Provide that lesson or stand self-exposed as an irrelevant windbag.

Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?

132 posted on 10/06/2003 1:19:29 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
You of all people are completely aware of Soros' involvement in drug legalization movements and his quest for total gun control.
133 posted on 10/06/2003 1:32:24 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
You of all people are completely aware of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's support for drug criminalization and their quest for total gun control---and smoking bans.

Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?
134 posted on 10/06/2003 1:35:39 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
You of all people are completely aware of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's support for drug LEGALIZATION!

Drug Strategies funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and George Soros

"Defensive" strategist Mathea Falco, ex-assistant secretary of state for International Narcotic Matters during the Carter administration, works at least unwittingly with the movement in the mainstream. Now the president of an institute in Washington D.C. called Drug Strategies, Falco has argued for an end to aggressive supply-side approaches, preferring instead more education and treatment. " Education and treatment," like "harm reduction" approaches, happens to be the mantra of the legalization kingpins as well. She advances this argument in a book sponsored by the Twentieth Century Fund entitled Winning the Drug War and in a widely-publicized report from her institute entitled Keeping the Score. The thrust of her works forces drug problem solutions into a false dichotomy: either supply interdiction or demand reduction, but not both. Since supply efforts appear to be failing, its time to shift to demand.

135 posted on 10/06/2003 2:06:31 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: MrLeRoy
Seems like Sweden tried the hard drug route and it failed. Following the 'gate-way' theory they have reduced drug use and drug related crime to historic lows.
136 posted on 10/06/2003 2:28:27 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
"The bulk of the money [for Partnership for a Drug Free America], Dnistrian [PDFA's VP] asserts, comes from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation" - http://www.metroactive.com/papers/cruz/01.25.96/pot2-9604.html
137 posted on 10/06/2003 2:29:03 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
My husband and I use 4 ashtrays in the house, one on each of our desks and one next to each of our chairs in the family room. They get emptied into the "burn barrel" outside everynight. There are 2 butts in the tray next to my chair and one in the tray on my desk, and I have been up since before 6 this morning.

Eeeuww ....

138 posted on 10/06/2003 2:30:00 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Seems like Sweden tried the hard drug route and it failed.

Provide evidence for your claim.

they have reduced drug use and drug related crime to historic lows.

Your praise for socialist Sweden is duly noted.

139 posted on 10/06/2003 2:30:08 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Has your position on smoking and property rights been correctly reported here?
140 posted on 10/06/2003 2:30:36 PM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson